>> This is not the notion that I tried to express, probably badly. It's not >> necessarily the important feature, it's the one that will make people >> implement and deploy the protocol stack in the first place.
> Suggestion for '"killer feature" of Homenet': driver for using Homenet That's good. >> If you find a sufficiently stately term that covers all of the above, >> I'll take it. (My thesaurus suggests "chieftain", but I tend to favour >> "foreman".) > Suggestion for "our bosses": decision makers "easy to explain to the decision makers"? It's okay, but sounds somewhat cold and corporate to my (admittedly foreign) ears. I'll wait a little while in case somebody has a better idea. (Since we all seem to be in a chatty mood -- on Tuesday last, I was teaching virtual memory allocation techniques, and needed a translation for "eager allocation" as opposed to "lazy". One student proposed "allocation zélée". I'm loving it.) -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
