> Hi, while editing draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation, it occured > to me that the automatic reverse that > draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options could enable > better/simpler RFC2317 delegation for IPv4 subnets. > > My experience is that some of the pushback for doing 2317 is that there is > sane way to automate it, and too many confusing ways to do it. > > So, I wrote: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-ipv4-reverse-in-v6/ > > which basically says to point the CNAMEs into the IPv6 delegation that is > "already" (will have been) being done.
The actual convention to use isn't really specified by 2317, only a few examples are given. This one should work just as well as any other convention, and if this makes it easier to use, I'm all for it. Best regards, - Håvard _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
