Reply to: Charles Stanley
Re: [IMail Forum] anti-virus solution on Friday 8:16:55 PM
From: Roger Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>I must agree. We have not captured any virus just yet, but we have been
>>using the RBL antispam and just installed the AntiVirus feature. I have
>>been searching for such products ever since I deployed Imail and this is
>>a big development. It requires almost no processor time, has less open
>>doors than SMTP virus scanners and costs a fraction of the cost. I am
>>using Declude on NT4SP6A with Imail 5.x and Norton Symantec AntiVirus
>>5.x command line scanner. I may keep Imail after all.
C> Hi Roger,
C> Help me out here, if you would please. Are you running Imail and Declude
C> on NT server, or NT WS?
C> Thanks,
C> Charles Stanley
C> Wizardware LLC
Server. I don't know that it should make any difference. The
simplicity of this program is part of its elegance as a solution.
My machine is a 700MHz PIII with 128MB ram. I can't say I am seeing
any major processor use even with virus scanning. it slows delivery
of mail slightly but even this is usually a matter of seconds.
--
bcnu
www.rleeheath.com
Roger Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ActivatorDesk(tm) Internet Desktop: www.activatordesk.com
InfoGrid(tm) Master Internet Index: www.infogrid.com
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
