Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2009-08-30 20:29 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > >> I did an archive white collecting of runlevel settings, and wanted to >> share it with you. :) >> >> First the start runlevel settings: >> >> * 1 # default-start: 2 3 4 5 s > > Only a cosmetic problem, or is this really different from "s 2 3 4 5"?
Probably he flagged them as it doesn't make sense to start during s and the other runlevels? >> I flagged the ones I suspect are buggy with (*). Some of them are >> already reported to the BTS. A bit surprised so many scripts is >> lacking stop runleve info, I must admit. > > Many of those 112 scripts started in runlevel S (and some of the others) > may not need to ever be stopped because they do not start a daemon -- > sudo comes to mind as an example. Agreed > However, 77 scripts which stop in runlevels 0 and 6 but not in 1 looks > like a lot of crap. I can add a lintian check for that. I also plan to (at least try to) write a check that looks for mismatches between the update-rc.d settings and the ones specified on the LSB header. Although I believe insserv's update-rc.d could also warn about that during runtime. Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net _______________________________________________ initscripts-ng-devel mailing list initscripts-ng-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/initscripts-ng-devel
