On 2009-08-30 21:59 +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Sven Joachim wrote: > >> On 2009-08-30 20:29 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >> >>> * 1 # default-start: 2 3 4 5 s >> >> Only a cosmetic problem, or is this really different from "s 2 3 4 5"? > > Probably he flagged them as it doesn't make sense to start during s and the > other runlevels?
Oh yes, now I see that "s 2 3 4 5" is also (correctly) flagged as suspicious. Two notorious examples of these are portmap and nfs-common. >> However, 77 scripts which stop in runlevels 0 and 6 but not in 1 looks >> like a lot of crap. > > I can add a lintian check for that. > > I also plan to (at least try to) write a check that looks for mismatches > between the update-rc.d settings and the ones specified on the LSB header. That would be much appreciated. Again, portmap has this problem here, reported by yours truly as #491042. > Although I believe insserv's update-rc.d could also warn about that during > runtime. Which it does not do currently, instead it silently ignores the arguments given and only uses the LSB header information. Sven _______________________________________________ initscripts-ng-devel mailing list initscripts-ng-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/initscripts-ng-devel