[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26809?focusedWorklogId=839669&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-839669
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on HIVE-26809:
-----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 17/Jan/23 14:45
Start Date: 17/Jan/23 14:45
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: difin commented on code in PR #3833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/3833#discussion_r1072298943
##########
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/io/orc/encoded/EncodedTreeReaderFactory.java:
##########
@@ -224,7 +237,252 @@ private static void skipCompressedIndex(boolean
isCompressed, PositionProvider i
index.getNext();
}
- protected static class StringStreamReader extends StringTreeReader
+ public static class StringDictionaryTreeReaderHive extends TreeReader {
Review Comment:
Hi @ayushtkn, I agree with you. It is not ideal approach. Before
implementing this approach I did try to adapt Hive, but I didn't succeed to
find how Hive could be adapted to ORC-1060 changes because those changes are
only inside internal implementation of Orc StringDictionaryTreeReader class.
I agree with you that this approach is not ideal and will backfire in future
when we try to upgrade and the changes in ORC depends on the ones which we
ditched, but Hive already heavily depends on internal ORC API by implementing
its own column readers on top of ORC and when upgrading to different ORC
version it is often required to make adaptations in Hive.
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 839669)
Time Spent: 5h 10m (was: 5h)
> Upgrade ORC to 1.8.1
> --------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-26809
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26809
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.0.0
> Reporter: Dmitriy Fingerman
> Assignee: Dmitriy Fingerman
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 5h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
