[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15122013#comment-15122013
]
Cheng Lian commented on SPARK-12725:
------------------------------------
One possible solution I was thinking about is that we can add a new
{{Attribute}} class named {{GeneratedAttributeRef}}, which is exactly the same
as {{AttributeReference}} except that it's {{sql}} representation includes
expression ID (e.g. {{gid_42}} instead of {{gid}}). To avoid code duplication,
we can extract common code into an abstract class, say {{AbstractAttributeRef}}.
[~yhuai] [~rxin] [~marmbrus] What do you think?
> SQL generation suffers from name conficts introduced by some analysis rules
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-12725
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12725
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: SQL
> Reporter: Cheng Lian
>
> Some analysis rules generate auxiliary attribute references with the same
> name but different expression IDs. For example, {{ResolveAggregateFunctions}}
> introduces {{havingCondition}} and {{aggOrder}}, and
> {{DistinctAggregationRewriter}} introduces {{gid}}.
> This is OK for normal query execution since these attribute references get
> expression IDs. However, it's troublesome when converting resolved query
> plans back to SQL query strings since expression IDs are erased.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
