[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15122043#comment-15122043 ]
Cheng Lian commented on SPARK-12725: ------------------------------------ Thanks, this also sounds good to me. Will try this approach first. > SQL generation suffers from name conficts introduced by some analysis rules > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SPARK-12725 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12725 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: SQL > Reporter: Cheng Lian > > Some analysis rules generate auxiliary attribute references with the same > name but different expression IDs. For example, {{ResolveAggregateFunctions}} > introduces {{havingCondition}} and {{aggOrder}}, and > {{DistinctAggregationRewriter}} introduces {{gid}}. > This is OK for normal query execution since these attribute references get > expression IDs. However, it's troublesome when converting resolved query > plans back to SQL query strings since expression IDs are erased. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org