Ta On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 8:04 PM K. Blum <benbigno...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Paolo, hi everyone, > > > Yeah, it works if I just replace add-grob-definition with: > > > > #(define (add-grob-definition grob-name grob-entry) > > (set! all-grob-descriptions > > (cons ((@@ (lily) completize-grob-entry) > > (cons grob-name grob-entry)) > > all-grob-descriptions))) > > > > That said, the snippet is _very_ useful, and certainly much easier to > > use than the lsr snippet. I strongly encourage the community to add it > > to the repository, because the trial and error method is inaccurate > > and time consuming. > > That said, is there an easy way to adapt it so that it draws a colored > > box (with transparency) instead of a rectangle with segments? > > if you read the further replies to the thread > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-01/msg00416.html > you will find that there was an attempt to combine David Nalesnik's > engraver with the colored boxes from snippet 1000: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-01/msg00416.html > > I've applied your version of add-grob-definition from above to the > latest working state of our attempts and came up with boxer3b.ly, see > attached. > This is really great, thanks, I'm going to use it intensively! fortunately you read and responded to my message, otherwise this feature would have been swallowed up and obscured in the confusion of the mailing list archive (and I would have wasted days reinventing the wheel). After I've done more testing I'll post a new message proposing to remove the current snippet from the LSR and replace it with yours and David's implementation. Cheers, Paoo > > Hope to help, > Klaus > >
