https://github.com/asb commented:

Probably best reviewed by someone who has more familiarity with 
RISCVTargetDefEmitter, but I took a look anyway.

I think this direction is OK, though I can't help but feel moving from the ISA 
naming strings to the more verbose listing of features is a bit of a regression 
in terms of ease of reading. I guess we'd be stuck with a recursive dependency 
if we wanted tablegen to be able to parse RISC-V ISA strings, as we'd be 
relying on the tablegenned extension definitions.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90187
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to