The first assumption ( A = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) is the idiomatic way to say
that ch is the result of substituting A for B in ps, and there are many
theorems that produce results of this form. The theorem is still true when
you only have a one-directional implication (in fact the first step of the
proof is to weaken it to one), but users of the theorem will normally have
the biconditional on hand so it is more convenient to write it that way to
make the theorems more interoperable.

This theorem is true in any classical logic, so it holds in both NF and
ZFC. (It does not hold in iset.mm, which uses intuitionistic logic, because
there is a case distinction on A = B in this theorem.)

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:31 PM bil...@gmail.com <bill...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Theorem pm2.61ne is:
>
> ● pm2.61ne.1
> |- ( A = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
>
> ● pm2.61ne.2
> |- ( ( ph /\ A =/= B ) -> ps )
>
> ● pm2.61ne.3
> |- ( ph -> ch )
>
> pm2.61ne
> |- ( ph -> ps )
>
> Question 1. Why isn't the first premise weakened to: ( A = B -> ( ch ->
> ps ) )
>
> Question 2. Is this is a "new foundation" theorem rather than a "zfc
> theorem"? Why is is being used in the proof of Theorem msqge0 which asserts
> ( A in R -> 0 <= ( A * A )) ?
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Metamath" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to metamath+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/8119ecde-1c93-4caf-92fc-f2efe2c0772cn%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/8119ecde-1c93-4caf-92fc-f2efe2c0772cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to metamath+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CAFXXJSu9Jgic7mxOviLAO%2BGxN1HtjBk%3D1YZU-6BTW4a%2BmKz4hA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to