Sun, 19 Jun 2016 17:35:39 -0700 Philip Guenther <guent...@gmail.com> > >> The important detail is whether the info provided is actually useful > > Yes. Committers get their commit bit by submitting diffs. > > > Seems like this was useful, so even minutest contributions help along. > > Someone who can't admit they were wrong can't be a good developer: we > all make mistakes and must be ready to have others catch our mistakes, > point them out to us, and *learn* from them and grow to be better > developers and better *people*. I've lost track of how many times > kettenis@ or miod@ or deraadt@ has pointed out a flaw in my logic or > my code; *acknowledging* the mistake and working to do better is the > only correct response. > > Philip Guenther
>From this, I gained understanding that past emails and decisions, based on them are not always valid for current emails (wink Ivan). Different decisions happen with each case, independently careful attention to all no matter how minor detail it may seem. Every contribution counts, and is reviewed and assessed for quality. My *mistake* was to misjudge and actually demonstrate quick memory by correlating *past* email, got that. If you think you can add more to this, please do, I would appreciate it.
