Hallo Martin, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For a while now, I noticed that this isn't the case anymore, but > I can't isolate a behaviour that would have me believe that there's > a new default I can build on. > > If I add a second default route (via a different gateway): > > default via 10.100.144.1 dev wifi > default via 10.11.50.5 dev tun-rw-ul
What's the goal of these two lines? You say: 1. Route all packages, you don't have another rule for, via 10.100.… 1. Route all packages, you don't have another rule for, via 10.11.… Do you want load balancing? Bye, Jörg. -- Der Wunsch, klug zu erscheinen, verhindert oft, es zu werden. (Francois de la Rochefoucauld) _______________________________________________ netconf-devel mailing list netconf-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf-devel