also sprach Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.05.25.1309 +0200]: > 1. Route all packages, you don't have another rule for, via 10.100.… > 1. Route all packages, you don't have another rule for, via 10.11.… > > Do you want load balancing?
No, it turns out that's what happens when ifupdown, using /sbin/route, brings up two ifaces with default routes. ip route won't, actually, it seems. I think what I want netconf to do if you bring up an iface with a default gateway if a default route already exists is to keep it in mind and make it active if the iface providing the currently active default route goes down. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems until lions have their historians, tales of the hunt shall always glorify the hunter. -- african proverb
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
_______________________________________________ netconf-devel mailing list netconf-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf-devel
