2017-03-29 12:32 GMT+02:00 Arnaud Quette <arnaud.que...@gmail.com>: > > > 2017-03-29 5:49 GMT+02:00 Spike <sp...@drba.org>: > (...) > >> Is this really the desired behavior? I can certainly work with it, but it >> seems it'd be nice if it could work with dns resolution (at least client >> side, the LISTEN statement I guess it's ok), but maybe I'm missing some >> good reason why this would cause other issues. >> > > this is indeed undocumented (will fix it after this mail and a quick > lunch), but that works >
I've clarified a bit: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/e83780337183d5369f892891df08775198231fe0 I'm interested in some feedback on whether this clarifies enough or not... thanks and cheers, Arno -- Eaton Data Center Automation Solutions - Opensource Leader - http://42ity.org NUT (Network UPS Tools) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr
_______________________________________________ Nut-upsuser mailing list Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser