https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
--- Comment #101 from Michal Svoboda <kde spatium org> 2010-05-21 19:48:46 --- I have seen those arguments too, but ... > 1. libpoppler was created with the intention of a readonly library therefore > it > does not support writing back to the pdf stream. *input* library has nothing to do with *output* library. "Print to PDF" works for many years already, so "copy to PDF and add annotations" might be an easy enough task to do, even if it was outside poppler. (The separation might even be positive.) > 2. The okular developers are satisfied enough with the situation as it is > today. As they do it in their spare time they do not want to spend too much > time on this. Spare time service does not imply unprofessional or lousy although the current status quo does seem that way. It would be at least nice to see some priority list of the bugs to know how far in the queue we are. Besides that I think there *are* paid people who contribute to okular and KDE in general. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel