https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614
Luigi Toscano <luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it --- Comment #103 from Luigi Toscano <luigi toscano tiscali it> 2010-05-21 20:45:35 --- (In reply to comment #101) > I have seen those arguments too, but ... > > > 1. libpoppler was created with the intention of a readonly library > > therefore it > > does not support writing back to the pdf stream. > > *input* library has nothing to do with *output* library. "Print to PDF" works > for many years already, so "copy to PDF and add annotations" might be an easy > enough task to do, even if it was outside poppler. (The separation might even > be positive.) No, it is not. > > > 2. The okular developers are satisfied enough with the situation as it is > > today. As they do it in their spare time they do not want to spend too much > > time on this. > > Spare time service does not imply unprofessional or lousy although the current > status quo does seem that way. It would be at least nice to see some priority > list of the bugs to know how far in the queue we are. So show us the code. > > Besides that I think there *are* paid people who contribute to okular and KDE > in general. Thanks. This is exactly the kind of poison which made two developers (including a maintainer) to leave the project. If this is your contribution to the discussion (where you missed some point to say the least) please refrain from doing it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel