lebre.adr...@free.fr wrote: > [...] > According to the different replies, I think we should enlarge the discussion > and not stay on the vCPE use-case, which is clearly specific and represents > only one use-case among the ones we would like to study. For instance we are > in touch with NRENs in France and Poland that are interested to deploy up to > one rack in each of their largest PoP in order to provide a distributed IaaS > platform (for further informations you can give a look to the presentation > we gave during the last summit [1] [2]).
+1 I think working on supporting more distributed clouds is worthwhile because the technology would enable a lot of new use cases. Centering the discussion on the Telco industry's specific vCPEs use case is unnecessarily limiting... > [...] > Regarding 2./, I mentioned the Architecture WG because we do not want to > develop additional software layers like Tricircle or other solutions (at > least for the moment). > The goal of the WG is to conduct studies and experiments to identify to what > extent current mechanisms can satisfy the needs of such a massively > distributed use-cases and what are the missing elements. Agreed that a bottom-up, incremental improvement strategy sounds more likely to succeed in an established project like OpenStack (compared to a big-bang top-bottom re-architecture). -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
