A significant number of custom/non-standard data structures are used in Pan. In some cases these non-standard data structures are apparently redundant and used without adding much value (i.e., Loki::AssocVector Vs std::map, pan::sorted_vector Vs std::set). Also, C++11 introduced a couple of standard data structures (std::array, std::unordered_map).

Considering this, and considering that these custom data structures date back to a time when C++ standard containers were still freshly implemented and therefore were notorious for their, say, non-optimal performance, and that including them affects the project's maintainability, would Pan's maintainers be open to the idea of replacing them with their C++ standard counterparts?


Rui Maciel

_______________________________________________
Pan-devel mailing list
Pan-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-devel

Reply via email to