Am Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:45:00 +0000 schrieb Rui Maciel: > A significant number of custom/non-standard data structures are used in > Pan. In some cases these non-standard data structures are apparently > redundant and used without adding much value (i.e., Loki::AssocVector Vs > std::map, pan::sorted_vector Vs std::set). Also, C++11 introduced a > couple of standard data structures (std::array, std::unordered_map). > > Considering this, and considering that these custom data structures date > back to a time when C++ standard containers were still freshly > implemented and therefore were notorious for their, say, non-optimal > performance, and that including them affects the project's > maintainability, would Pan's maintainers be open to the idea of > replacing them with their C++ standard counterparts? > > > Rui Maciel
Do you have the time and skill to profile _and_ test the status-quo and c+ + stl containers for their scalability ;) ? if so, be my guest. i will gladly accept any patches. cheers _______________________________________________ Pan-devel mailing list Pan-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-devel