On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 05:21:33 +0200, Christoph Grüninger wrote:
> thanks for link to the developer mailing list discussion. I think CMake 3.3 
> is better then
> 3.5, because at least the last Leap 42.1 release provides that.
> I patched ParaView to require CMake 3.0 and it builds fine. I will package 
> ParaView 5.1
> that way and hope you reduce the requirement to CMake 3.3 for the next time.

I think the easiest way to check this would be to set the minimum to 3.3
and run against 3.5 to see if any POLICY warnings are triggered for the
way openSUSE builds ParaView. If they are, the old version is probably
silently doing something wrong.

--Ben
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to