On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 00:25:00 +0200, Cory Quammen wrote: > @Utkarsh, any foreseeable problems reducing the CMake required version to 3.3?
I think we'll want 3.5 in the (hopefully) near future, so if distributions don't have a new enough CMake, they can patch it down to 3.3 in the meantime. A comment might be worthwhile. Though I question the distro update policies surrounding where ParaView is aggressively pushed forward when CMake isn't. CMake is *much* better with its backwards compatibility, but I guess it's down to maintainer style to some extent. > @Ben, I assume all the dashboard machines are running CMake 3.5. Do > you think we should downgrade one to CMake 3.3? I was actually going to upgrade them to 3.6's rc today to test it out. --Ben _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
