I don't disagree with the overspiced evaluation but the other doesn't even have
salt and pepper. Definitely more on the foreground but not so much as the
before image, which does seem to have an artefact at the junction of land and
sky. The sky is possibly better in the new version (in that it is more
realistic - I don't know, as I was not there) but that is arguably a matter of
taste.
> On 16/02/2024 18:00 GMT Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> w rote:
>
>
> Interesting. Thank you people. I had felt that in general the first version
> was a bit "over spiced". I'm trying to find the right balance between making
> the image pop, and overdoing it. If you look at other photos in the
> collection, there is a lot of light pollution close to the horizon, and when
> saturation and vibrance are dialed up a lot of swatches of green and magenta
> noise in the sky in general.
>
> The new version of lightroom does make it easier for me to duplicate and
> modify masks, so when I get a chance, I can try a version with more
> saturation, contrast and clarity in the milky way.
>
> Is there consensus that I should also bring up the exposure on the
> foreground? I did create a mask for the snow on mount Shasta, which I had
> dialed down a bit from the previous print.
>
> Larry
>
>
> > On Feb 16, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Paul Sorenson <pentax1...@studio1941.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > I'd have to agree with Mike - the 889-pano is more pleasing to me than
> > NR-HDR-Pano. The milky way is better rendered and being able to better see
> > the horizon and landscape add to be overall image.
> >
> > -p
> >
> >
> > 89888-Enhanced-NR-HDR-Pano
> >
> > On 2/16/2024 2:28 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> >> I decided to have a go at another one of my photos, trying to take
> >> advantage of new features in lightroom. It is an HDR panorama (at 15 and
> >> 20 seconds). For the new version I did a lightroom noise reduction of
> >> each of the frames before doing an HDR pano stitch.
> >>
> >> I believe this is my previous version that I used for printing:
> >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/30524911188/in/album-72177720314781277/
> >>
> >> This one is my current "best try":
> >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/53532544424/in/album-72177720314781277/
> >> I've learned a fair bit about using masks in the process.
> >>
> >> All of my processing attempts over the years are in this album:
> >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/albums/72177720314781277/with/42907311702
> >>
> >> I would appreciate people's thoughts about what improvements the
> >> processing might need. Is there anything about any of the older attempts
> >> that worked better?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Larry
> >> --
> >> Larry Colen
> >> l...@red4est.com. sent from Mirkwood
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> To unsubscribe send an email topdml-le...@pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> >> follow the directions.
> >>
> > --
> > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> > follow the directions.
> >
>
> --
> Larry Colen
> l...@red4est.com sent from ret13est
>
>
>
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
> the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
