On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 10:43:50AM +0100, Jelte Fennema wrote:
> Side-question: What's the reason why pgindent is used instead of some
> more "modern" code formatter that doesn't require keeping
> typedefs.list up to date for good looking output? (e.g. uncrustify or
> clang-format) Because that would also allow for easy editor
> integration.
Good question. Our last big pgindent dicussion was in 2017, where I
said:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20170612213525.GA4074%40momjian.us#a96eac96c147ebcc1de86fe2356a160d
Understood. You would think that with the number of open-source
programs written in C that there would be more interest in C formatting
tools. Is the Postgres community the only ones with specific
requirements, or is it just that we settled on an older tool and can't
easily change? I have reviewed the C formatting options a few times
over the years and every time the other options were worse than what we
had.
We also discussed it in 2011, and this email was key for me:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/201106220218.p5M2InB08144%40momjian.us#096cbcf02cb58c7d6c49bc79d2c79317
I am excited Andrew has done this. It has been on my TODO list for a
while --- I was hoping someday we could switch to GNU indent but gave up
after the GNU indent report from Greg Stark that exactly matched my
experience years ago:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg01436.php
Basically, GNU indent has new bugs, but bugs that are harder to work
around than the BSD indent bugs.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Embrace your flaws. They make you human, rather than perfect,
which you will never be.
