> On 3 Apr 2023, at 15:09, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 8:46 AM Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: >> All comments above addressed in the attached v5, thanks for review! > > I continue to think it's odd that the sense of this is inverted as > compared with row_security.
I'm not sure I follow. Do you propose that the GUC enables classes of event triggers, the default being "all" (or similar) and one would remove the type of EVT for which debugging is needed? That doesn't seem like a bad idea, just one that hasn't come up in the discussion (and I didn't think about). -- Daniel Gustafsson
