On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 14:22, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 08:31:28PM +1300, David Rowley wrote: > > Those all look fine to me too. > > +1.
I've pushed this. I backpatched due to the typo in the fsync GUC description. I'd have only pushed to master if it were just the comment typos. I noticed older versions had another instance of "insure" in a code comment. I opted to leave that one alone since that file is now gone in more recent versions. David
