On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:44 AM Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:54 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > The user choosing to convert a physical standby to a subscriber would > > in some cases be interested in converting it for all the databases > > (say for the case of upgrade [1]) and giving options for each database > > would be cumbersome for her. > > > > ... > > > > [1] - This tool can be used in an upgrade where the user first > > converts physical standby to subscriber to get incremental changes and > > then performs an online upgrade. > > > > The first use case me and Euler discussed some time ago to upstream this tool > was exactly what Amit described so IMHO we should make it easier for users to > subscribe to all existing user databases. >
I feel that will be a good use case for this tool especially now (with this release) when we allow upgrade of subscriptions. In this regard, I feel if the user doesn't specify any database it should have subscriptions for all databases and the user should have a way to provide publication/slot/subscription names. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
