On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:05 PM Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > We can think on that later if we really need another > > field which give us sync time. > > I think that calling GetCurrentTimestamp() so frequently could be too costly, > so > I'm not sure we should.
Agreed. > > In my second approach, I have tried to > > avoid updating inactive_since for synced slots during sync process. We > > update that field during creation of synced slot so that > > inactive_since reflects correct info even for synced slots (rather > > than copying from primary). > > Yeah, and I think we could create a dedicated field with this information > if we feel the need. Okay. thanks Shveta
