On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 7:57 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I wrote: > > Hmm, is that actually true? There's no more reason to think a tuple > > in a temp table is old enough to be visible to all other sessions > > than one in any other table. It could be all right if we had a > > special-case rule for setting all-visible in temp tables. Which > > indeed I thought we had, but I can't find any evidence of that in > > vacuumlazy.c, nor did a trawl of the commit log turn up anything > > promising. Am I just looking in the wrong place? > > Ah, never mind that --- I must be looking in the wrong place. > Direct experimentation proves that VACUUM will set all-visible bits > for temp tables even in the presence of concurrent transactions.
If this seems correct to you, are you okay with the rest of the fix and test? We could close this open item once the patch is acceptable. - Melanie
