On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 1:19 PM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So my point was: to me, N is more self-documenting than replace_at, > and less self-documenting than count or occurrence. > > If your mileage varies on that point, so be it! > > Maybe just "match" instead of "replace_match". Reading this it strikes me that any of these parameter names can and probably should be read as having "replace" in front of them: replace N replace count replace occurrence replace match Saying replace becomes redundant: replace replace at replace replace match David J.
