Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Microbenchmarks:
$ ./python -m perf timeit --duplicate 100 "enumerate('abc')" Unpatched: Median +- std dev: 1.76 us +- 0.10 us Patched: Median +- std dev: 1.61 us +- 0.07 us $ ./python -m perf timeit --duplicate 100 "enumerate('abc', 1)" Unpatched: Median +- std dev: 2.14 us +- 0.09 us Patched: Median +- std dev: 1.76 us +- 0.07 us $ ./python -m perf timeit --duplicate 100 "reversed('abc')" Unpatched: Median +- std dev: 1.20 us +- 0.06 us Patched: Median +- std dev: 1.20 us +- 0.07 us enumerate() is 9-21% faster (due to avoiding of tuple creating), reversed() is not changed (Argument Clinic generates the same parsing code for it). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20186> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com