On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 20:08:35 -0800 Andrew Barnert <abarn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 2020, at 16:11, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> > > wrote: > > > > Shai Berger wants to set it implicily, based on where the raise is. > > If it is "directly" under the except line, implicitly set the cause. > > > > I interpreted “directly under” as meaning “directly lexically > contained by”, not “on the next physical line”. And even if that > isn’t what Shai meant, it’s what I meant. :) > Just for the record, that *is* what I meant. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/5FQU43FM5A54RFXG6HE44QAJ6BLITTRP/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/