> > If CRAN cannot trust even the official one of Rust, why does CRAN have Rust > > at all? > > > > I don't see the connection - if you downloaded something in the past it > doesn't mean you will be able to do so in the future. And CRAN has Rust > because it sounded like a good idea to allow packages to use it, but I can > see that it opened a can of worms that we trying to tame here.
Can you give a bit more detail about your concerns here? Obviously crates.io isn't some random site on the internet, it's the official repository of the Rust language, supported by the corresponding foundation for the language. To me that makes it feel very much like CRAN, where we can assume if you downloaded something in the past, you can download something in the future. Hadley -- http://hadley.nz ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
