I have heard lots of support for moving to GitHub, and I do not really understand the arguments against. Is there more than "trac is what we're used to"? Can those who are opposed please articulate the reasons?
I appreciate the efforts by Matthias and others to provide a roadmap for the proposed transition. -- John On Saturday, September 10, 2022 at 4:19:37 PM UTC-7 Nathan Dunfield wrote: > I think moving to GitHub makes total sense. Every other open-source math > project I use regularly is on GH, and there are big network-effect benefits > to being where everyone else is as others have already pointed out: easier > for others to contribute, easier to get credit for contributions, easier > cross references to issues up and downstream, etc. Given the range of > projects that use GH, including those like numpy and scipy whose issue/PR > counts are similar to the number Sage trac tickets, I'm sure any technical > or workflow issues have already been overcome by others and the solutions > are likely even documented. Given the open-source community's reliance on > GH, any serious misbehavior on GH's part would result in a massive pushback > and, if necessary, a concerted effort by a huge number of people to work > out an alternative. > > Nathan > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/c52bc1f4-25a7-4a5a-89e9-7929977a58b3n%40googlegroups.com.
