I already pointed out that our project will certainly benefit from being more like successful Python systems, e.g. how they don't vendor compilers and a good portion of PyPI packages.
CoCs are a nice cherry on the tart, yes. PS. The question whether an attempt to sneak the NumFocus application through the back door without a proper community consultation is a violation of our CoC is left as a homework for the readers. On 14 January 2024 17:44:06 GMT, Matthias Koeppe <matthiaskoe...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sunday, January 14, 2024 at 9:07:07 AM UTC-8 David Roe wrote: > >Is there any reason for the quick turnaround time? > > >Yes, it is motivated by the current crisis of abuse and misconduct in the >community. >Our project will benefit from engaging closely with projects and >organizations that have working CoC with clear enforcement protocols. >https://numfocus.org/code-of-conduct, >https://numfocus.org/code-of-conduct/response-and-enforcement-events-meetups, >https://numpy.org/code-of-conduct/, >https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/dev/conduct/code_of_conduct.html > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"sage-devel" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >To view this discussion on the web visit >https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/26be11e0-75aa-472e-b594-3dd234107f52n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/0F11CC36-04AD-440E-946E-44007EAFF8C4%40gmail.com.
