Tobias, you must have missed that making the package standard does set a 
version "constraint". Those are set in "install-requires.txt" files, and 
in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37301 you can see that the 
packages remain unconstrained.

On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 5:47:46 AM UTC-8 tobia...@gmx.de wrote:

> +1 for the one-line change of the type from "optional" to "standard". -1 
> on everything ("standard pip" or "standard wheel") that involves an 
> unnecessary version constraint and an explicit declaration of the runtime 
> dependencies.
>
>
>
> On Saturday, February 17, 2024 at 4:51:45 PM UTC+8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>> I have made it clear under what condition you can count my vote as +1.
>>
>> To make it clear: it is -1 if the condition is not met.
>>
>>
>> On 17 February 2024 04:26:14 GMT, Matthias Koeppe <matthia...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Note that posting a proposal here on sage-devel to make the packages 
>>> standard followed the policies of our project. 
>>> "optional packages stay in that status for at least a year, after which 
>>> they can be proposed to be included as standard packages in Sage. For this 
>>> a GitHub PR is opened with the label c: packages: standard. Then make a 
>>> proposal in the Google Group sage-devel." 
>>> https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/packaging.html#inclusion-procedure-for-new-and-updated-packages
>>>
>>> Multicasting "negative reviews" to tickets is not part of the procedures 
>>> of our project; cf. 
>>> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36726#issuecomment-1820148873 on 
>>> the emergence of this idea.
>>>
>>> On Friday, February 16, 2024 at 4:34:12 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 16 February 2024 23:33:48 GMT, Matthias Koeppe <matthia...@gmail.com> 
>>>> wrote: 
>>>> >On Friday, February 16, 2024 at 1:25:13 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: 
>>>> > 
>>>> >>On Friday, February 16, 2024 at 9:38:16 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik 
>>>> wrote: 
>>>> >My vote for is conditional on them remaining pip packages, and that's 
>>>> not 
>>>> >what your PRs do. 
>>>> > 
>>>> > 
>>>> >I'll count that as 0. 
>>>>
>>>> you can count that as negative reviews on your PRs 
>>>> as they are now. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > 
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/0b84b09a-3a20-4a5f-91ea-f38566b33ed4n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to