Dear all, First, in response to Dima's post: yes, it should definitely be Nils Bruin on the ballot. My sincere apologies to Nils that we got his name wrong! If anyone would like to adjust their ballot in light of this, please let us know and we will make any corrections you request.
Second, voting closes tomorrow. Please vote! Regards, John On Wednesday, March 13, 2024 at 8:05:32 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 6:13:42 PM UTC David Roe wrote: > > Dear Sage developers, > Thank you for those you nominated people for the committee following my > request > <https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/u-jUo098jQg/m/Hdiqzn0GAwAJ>, > and thank you for those of you willing to serve. The nominees are > > Nils Braun (nbr...@sfu.ca) > > > Braun? Or Bruin ? > > I didn't notice when I voted (noticed only last night), as I blindly > assumed it's Bruin, > and just went and searched for Nils Braun at SFU, (nobody found) > but that's too big a typo to let this unnoticed. > > It can very well be that someone looked at Nils Braun (<nbr.....@sfu.ca>) > and was unable to figure out who this is - and just skipped. > > Note that Nils Bruin has a github handle: https://github.com/nbruin > but it was not listed. > > I think the vote shoud be re-done - if it's indeed not a mystical Nils > Braun > on the ballot, and not Nils Bruin > > Cheers, > Dima > > > > > > > > J-P Labbé (jeanphil...@gmail.com, jplab on github) > John Palmieri (jhpalm...@gmail.com, jhpalmieri on github) > Viviane Pons (vivia...@gmail.com, VivianePons on github) > David Roe (roed...@gmail.com, roed314 on github) > Julian Rüth (julian...@fsfe.org, saraedum on github) > William Stein (wst...@gmail.com, williamstein on github) > Yuan Zhou (xiaoy...@gmail.com, yuan-zhou on github) > > Please send votes to sage-c...@googlegroups.com* by Thursday, March 14. > We are using approval voting > <https://electionscience.org/library/approval-voting/>, so you can vote > for as many candidates as you like. The committee will include at least > the top 5 candidates, and will be enlarged to include all tied candidates > if there is a tie for 5th place. Note that you can choose to vote for more > or less than 5 candidates if you like. > > Discussion of candidates is allowed (feel free to continue this thread), > but please be respectful. If you want to see the participation of these > candidates in the Sage community, you can search by name on sage-devel > <https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel> and on github > <https://github.com/sagemath/sage>. > > Thanks for voting, > David > for the Sage Code of Conduct Committee > > * We are replacing sage-...@googlegroups.com with > sage-c...@googlegroups.com; they currently have the same membership. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/fd4b3d24-51a6-49fc-a59c-6167e7c05654n%40googlegroups.com.
