Isn't this what you want?

sage: R.<x,y> = QQ[]
sage: phi = R.hom([x,x])
sage: phi
Ring endomorphism of Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x, y over Rational 
Field
  Defn: x |--> x
        y |--> x
sage: phi.kernel()
Ideal (x - y) of Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x, y over Rational Field

On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 6:08:16 PM UTC+9 Dima Pasechnik wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, 05:57 John H Palmieri, <jhpalm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have any tips for how to compute the kernel of a map between 
>> polynomial algebras, or for checking whether the map is injective? I have 
>> families of such maps involving algebras with many generators. I'm working 
>> over GF(2), if that matters. In one example I defined the map phi: R -> S 
>> where R has 12 generators, S has 19 generators, and did
>>
>>     sage: phi.is_injective()
>>
>> After about 30 hours, Sage quit on me, perhaps running out of memory 
>> ("Killed: 9"). An example of the sort of map I'm interested in:
>>
>> sage: phi
>> Ring morphism:
>>   From: Multivariate Polynomial Ring in h20, h21, h30, h31, h40, h41, h50 
>> over Finite Field of size 2
>>   To:   Multivariate Polynomial Ring in h20, h21, h30, h31, h40, h41, 
>> h50, xi1, xi2, xi3, xi4, xi5 over Finite Field of size 2
>>   Defn: h20 |--> h20
>>         h21 |--> h21
>>         h30 |--> h20*xi1^4 + h21*xi1 + h30
>>         h31 |--> h21*xi1^8 + h31
>>         h40 |--> h21*xi1^9 + h30*xi1^8 + h20*xi2^4 + h31*xi1
>>         h41 |--> h31*xi1^16 + h21*xi2^8
>>         h50 |--> h31*xi1^17 + h21*xi1*xi2^8 + h30*xi2^8 + h20*xi3^4
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>
> The standard way to find the kernel of a map 
> phi: A->B is to take the
> ring R generated by the gens of A and B and compute the Gröbner basis of 
> the ideal I generated by {a-phi(a)|a in gens(A)}, and then
> take the intersection of I with A.
> (for the latter you have to take R with an appropriate order)
>
> The Gröbner basis would be done by Singular.
> Better Gröbner basis routines are available in the msolve spkg.
>
> I'd try using msolve. There are also options such as computing I w.r.t. to 
> an "easier" order and then chaniging the order (so-called Gröbner walk), 
> they might work better here (it's all more of art than science here)
>
>
>
> HTH
> Dima
>
>
>> -- 
>> John
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "sage-support" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to sage-support...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/97318b8e-f4c9-4af3-a8ff-b901a4f2c971n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/97318b8e-f4c9-4af3-a8ff-b901a4f2c971n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/487bf189-fce6-4b6b-9752-178602ff9808n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to