Hi, Andrew Bartlett, 11. November 2003 um 10:58 you wrote:
AB> On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 20:32, rruegner wrote: >> Hi, we decide t make translation in html first, >> afterwards convert it to other types later. >> Dont forget its Gnu so anyone can convert it to what ever he wants AB> Sounds like a auful lot of work, and the end result won't match the AB> original in formatting, and other important aspects. There is a lot of AB> extra information in the XML that can't be represented in HTML. AB> Given that you are already working in HTML, is the raw XML really that AB> much harder to deal with? That way you can ensure that you really are AB> just translating the text, and not altering the format, references etc. I have no problem in doing all this work in XML. Right now I am editing the files in my web-editor, changing nothing of the meta-infos that are in. The files on the project page are converted to plain html right now, but we could also use OpenOffice, as suggested, to work in another format. I agree with you that it makes no sense to alter formats without good reasons. regards, Stefan G. Weichinger mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba