Re: f39-candidate ~> f39-build stuck or something?

[Milan Crha]

On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 15:15 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> So my suggestion would be to use a self service side tag for rawhide
> as well, not just F39.

Hi,
thanks for the confirmation. It means more manual work to be done (and
not be forgotten), but I see it has also its advantages. I'll do it
that way.

Bye,
Milan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: f39-candidate ~> f39-build stuck or something?

[Kalev Lember]

On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 1:01 PM Milan Crha  wrote:

> Hi again,
> with the problem on the rawhide, I managed to build evolution-data-
> server update for F39 with no problem, but the chain-build [1] to
> wait for the f39-build refresh/update to have the new eds. It waited
> for 2 hours, which is quite a lot of time.
>
> For what it's worth:
>
> $ koji wait-repo f39-build --build evolution-data-server-3.50.3-1.fc39
> nvr evolution-data-server-3.50.3-1.fc39 is not current in tag f39-build
>   latest build in f39-build is evolution-data-server-3.50.2-1.fc39
>

Yes, this only works for side tags. The previous F39 build,
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109761881 was done in a
side tag as well.

Chain builds kinda work without side tags for rawhide, but they take
forever to complete because each individual build in the chain build needs
to go through bodhi and openqa testing, before it can land in rawhide build
root, so each step (after the build has completed) takes more than an hour.
With a side tag, chain build is much faster and you can submit everything
together to bodhi so that all the new builds are tested as a single unit.

So my suggestion would be to use a self service side tag for rawhide as
well, not just F39.

-- 
Hope this helps,
Kalev
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

f39-candidate ~> f39-build stuck or something?

[Milan Crha]

Hi again,
with the problem on the rawhide, I managed to build evolution-data-
server update for F39 with no problem, but the chain-build [1] to
wait for the f39-build refresh/update to have the new eds. It waited
for 2 hours, which is quite a lot of time.

For what it's worth:

$ koji wait-repo f39-build --build evolution-data-server-3.50.3-1.fc39
nvr evolution-data-server-3.50.3-1.fc39 is not current in tag f39-build
  latest build in f39-build is evolution-data-server-3.50.2-1.fc39


$ koji latest-pkg f39-build evolution-data-server
Build Tag   Built by
    --
evolution-data-server-3.50.2-1.fc39   f39-updates   mcrha


$ koji latest-pkg f39-updates-candidate evolution-data-server
Build Tag   Built by
  - --
evolution-data-server-3.50.3-1.fc39   f39-updates-candidate  mcrha


What can I do make it work, please? Or is chain-build supported only on
the side tags these days? I'm pretty sure it worked fine a month ago.

I do not see any f39 repo-rebuild related task between current active
tasks on koji [2].
Bye,
Milan

[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111321411
[2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Build stuck on ppc64le

[Dan Horák]

On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 12:07:10 +
"Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:

> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96612861
> 
> The build has completed already on other arches, but on ppc64le it has
> been stuck for ~ 45 minutes.  What's especially odd is that it has
> apparently picked a builder (so it's not stuck waiting for a free
> machine) but the builder isn't making progress.

I think the builder is on a host that's not responding currently, I
will free the task, so another active builder can pick it up


Dan

> 
> Rich.
> 
> -- 
> Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
> Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
> libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
> bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Build stuck on ppc64le

[Richard W.M. Jones]

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96612861

The build has completed already on other arches, but on ppc64le it has
been stuck for ~ 45 minutes.  What's especially odd is that it has
apparently picked a builder (so it's not stuck waiting for a free
machine) but the builder isn't making progress.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Rawhide build stuck in pending state

[Jerry James]

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 12:55 AM Petr Pisar  wrote:
> Try creating a ticket at . That's the place
> closest to people with Suport Powers.

Thanks, Petr.  I have filed https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11103.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Rawhide build stuck in pending state

[Petr Pisar]

V Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:12:43AM -0600, Jerry James napsal(a):
> A package I built last night for Rawhide is stuck in the pending state:
> 
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-abb2715b03
> 
> I can't seem to find a button to push to get it to move along.  Can
> somebody with Super Powers give that update a kick, please?

Try creating a ticket at . That's the place
closest to people with Suport Powers.

-- Petr


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Rawhide build stuck in pending state

[Jerry James]

A package I built last night for Rawhide is stuck in the pending state:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-abb2715b03

I can't seem to find a button to push to get it to move along.  Can
somebody with Super Powers give that update a kick, please?
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 08:32:15AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> And for https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6f79c53e44
> 
> I don't have permission to untag and retag the f30-signing-pending tag.
> 
> Many thanks for your help.

ok. Fixed. 

I actually already had this on my list. I have been trying to watch the
updates push logs and catch when it warns about an unsigned ceph. 

kevin
--
> 
> 
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 4:02 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:12:58PM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> >
> > > Okay. Other builds I've done for f32 (gluster, nfs-ganesha, earlier ceph
> > > builds even) all went straight to stable in bodhi, but this one didn't,
> > > despite waiting several hours.
> >
> > Well, all of those likely were autosubmitted by gating? It looks like
> > you submitted the ceph one manually before the gating could catch it. ;(
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6ebb10dcbc
> > "This update was automatically created"
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-995f3ae953
> > "This update has been submitted for testing by kkeithle."
> >
> > I know the folks working on gating were trying to make it so this
> > happened before anyone could submit a manual update. It would be nice if
> > it just blocked that entirely.
> >
> > > Then there's the ceph build for f31[1] that's still stuck in pending
> > > testing after two days.
> >
> > I got that one unstuck.
> >
> > > And the ceph build for f30[2] that's been in testing for 15 days that
> > isn't
> > > allowing me push it to stable.
> > >
> > > ???
> >
> > I think it's due to it being a critical path update...
> >
> > > Thanks for your help though, greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks for bringing this stuff up, we need to improve things. ;(
> >
> > kevin
> > --
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > [1]https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-62e251afd9
> > > [2]https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f47093cc3d
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Kaleb
> >


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again

[Kaleb Keithley]

And for https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6f79c53e44

I don't have permission to untag and retag the f30-signing-pending tag.

Many thanks for your help.


On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 4:02 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:12:58PM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
> > Okay. Other builds I've done for f32 (gluster, nfs-ganesha, earlier ceph
> > builds even) all went straight to stable in bodhi, but this one didn't,
> > despite waiting several hours.
>
> Well, all of those likely were autosubmitted by gating? It looks like
> you submitted the ceph one manually before the gating could catch it. ;(
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6ebb10dcbc
> "This update was automatically created"
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-995f3ae953
> "This update has been submitted for testing by kkeithle."
>
> I know the folks working on gating were trying to make it so this
> happened before anyone could submit a manual update. It would be nice if
> it just blocked that entirely.
>
> > Then there's the ceph build for f31[1] that's still stuck in pending
> > testing after two days.
>
> I got that one unstuck.
>
> > And the ceph build for f30[2] that's been in testing for 15 days that
> isn't
> > allowing me push it to stable.
> >
> > ???
>
> I think it's due to it being a critical path update...
>
> > Thanks for your help though, greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks for bringing this stuff up, we need to improve things. ;(
>
> kevin
> --
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > [1]https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-62e251afd9
> > [2]https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f47093cc3d
> >
> > --
> >
> > Kaleb
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:12:58PM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:

> Okay. Other builds I've done for f32 (gluster, nfs-ganesha, earlier ceph
> builds even) all went straight to stable in bodhi, but this one didn't,
> despite waiting several hours.

Well, all of those likely were autosubmitted by gating? It looks like
you submitted the ceph one manually before the gating could catch it. ;( 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6ebb10dcbc
"This update was automatically created"

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-995f3ae953
"This update has been submitted for testing by kkeithle."

I know the folks working on gating were trying to make it so this
happened before anyone could submit a manual update. It would be nice if
it just blocked that entirely. 

> Then there's the ceph build for f31[1] that's still stuck in pending
> testing after two days.

I got that one unstuck. 

> And the ceph build for f30[2] that's been in testing for 15 days that isn't
> allowing me push it to stable.
> 
> ???

I think it's due to it being a critical path update... 

> Thanks for your help though, greatly appreciated.

Thanks for bringing this stuff up, we need to improve things. ;( 

kevin
--
> 
> Regards,
> 
> [1]https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-62e251afd9
> [2]https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f47093cc3d
> 
> --
> 
> Kaleb


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:41 AM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> On 9/20/19 6:07 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 7:33 PM Kaleb Keithley 
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 2:18 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 9/19/19 5:26 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>  Someone with privs please kick it.  Thanks
> 
>  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-995f3ae953
> >>>
> >>> Done. Do note that you can do this too, just untag it from f32-pending
> >>> and tag it again into f32-pending.
> >>
> >>
> > Question: you did it. I did it. In Koji[1] it has f32 and
> > f32-updates-candidate tags.  And in bodhi[2] it's still showing as
> pending
> > testing. What should it be? What should I do at this point to get it out
> of
> > pending testing and into testing?
>
> There is no testing for rawhide.
>
> The f32 tag means it should be in composes.
>
> The issue here is that you created this bodhi update... for rawhide
> gating it just does all the work, you should not create updates for
> rawhide.
>
> I can see if I can get someone to poke it and make it reflect reality,
> but it's already stable and there's nothing further to do (except clean
> up what bodhi thinks).
>

Okay. Other builds I've done for f32 (gluster, nfs-ganesha, earlier ceph
builds even) all went straight to stable in bodhi, but this one didn't,
despite waiting several hours.

Then there's the ceph build for f31[1] that's still stuck in pending
testing after two days.

And the ceph build for f30[2] that's been in testing for 15 days that isn't
allowing me push it to stable.

???

Thanks for your help though, greatly appreciated.

Regards,

[1]https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-62e251afd9
[2]https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f47093cc3d

--

Kaleb
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 9/20/19 6:07 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 7:33 PM Kaleb Keithley  wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 2:18 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/19/19 5:26 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
 Someone with privs please kick it.  Thanks

 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-995f3ae953
>>>
>>> Done. Do note that you can do this too, just untag it from f32-pending
>>> and tag it again into f32-pending.
>>
>>
> Question: you did it. I did it. In Koji[1] it has f32 and
> f32-updates-candidate tags.  And in bodhi[2] it's still showing as pending
> testing. What should it be? What should I do at this point to get it out of
> pending testing and into testing?

There is no testing for rawhide.

The f32 tag means it should be in composes.

The issue here is that you created this bodhi update... for rawhide
gating it just does all the work, you should not create updates for
rawhide.

I can see if I can get someone to poke it and make it reflect reality,
but it's already stable and there's nothing further to do (except clean
up what bodhi thinks).

kevin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 7:33 PM Kaleb Keithley  wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 2:18 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
>
>> On 9/19/19 5:26 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>> > Someone with privs please kick it.  Thanks
>> >
>> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-995f3ae953
>>
>> Done. Do note that you can do this too, just untag it from f32-pending
>> and tag it again into f32-pending.
>
>
Question: you did it. I did it. In Koji[1] it has f32 and
f32-updates-candidate tags.  And in bodhi[2] it's still showing as pending
testing. What should it be? What should I do at this point to get it out of
pending testing and into testing?

[1]https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1379110

[2]https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-995f3ae953

Thanks

--

Kaleb
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again

[Kaleb Keithley]

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 2:18 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> On 9/19/19 5:26 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > Someone with privs please kick it.  Thanks
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-995f3ae953
>
> Done. Do note that you can do this too, just untag it from f32-pending
> and tag it again into f32-pending.
>

Okay, cool.  I wish someone had told me sooner, I'd have stopped bothering
people for this. :-)

Thanks

--

Kaleb
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 9/19/19 5:26 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> Someone with privs please kick it.  Thanks
> 
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-995f3ae953

Done. Do note that you can do this too, just untag it from f32-pending
and tag it again into f32-pending.

And I am again sorry we don't have this fixed...

kevin



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

YACBSIPT, rawhide ceph build stuck in bodhi, again

[Kaleb Keithley]

Someone with privs please kick it.  Thanks

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-995f3ae953
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Another ceph build stuck in pending testing, four days

[Kaleb Keithley]

Thanks for opening the ticket, but the update is still stuck, now going on
nine days.

Would someone with the necessary privs please kick it.

Thanks


On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 1:52 PM Randy Barlow 
wrote:

> On Sun, 2019-06-02 at 18:03 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-60ba61b5ab
> >
> > Why does this happen every time?
> >
> > Would someone please kick it? Thanks
>
> I filed an issue about this for you:
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7871
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Another ceph build stuck in pending testing, four days

[Randy Barlow]

On Sun, 2019-06-02 at 18:03 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-60ba61b5ab
> 
> Why does this happen every time?
> 
> Would someone please kick it? Thanks

I filed an issue about this for you:

https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7871


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Another ceph build stuck in pending testing, four days

[Kaleb Keithley]

Hi,

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-60ba61b5ab

Why does this happen every time?

Would someone please kick it? Thanks

--

Kaleb
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Build stuck setting up buildroot

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
> I've freed the task to another builder.
>
> For some reason that machine (it's aarch64-c17n1) has vm's that are
> really really slow. I thought we fixed it, but apparently not. ;( I've
> disabled those so no builds will happen on them while we try and sort it
> out.

Thank you, Kevin!  That did the trick.  The build has finished.  Much
appreciated.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Build stuck setting up buildroot

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 10/04/2017 12:36 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I started an F27 build this morning:
> 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=979845
> 
> Hours later, all arches but 32-bit ARM have finished.  The 32-bit ARM
> build appears to be stuck setting up the buildroot.  Build.log shows
> that the build hasn't actually started yet, and the last bit of
> root.log reads:
> 
> DEBUG util.py:439:  Running transaction check
> DEBUG util.py:439:  Transaction check succeeded.
> DEBUG util.py:439:  Running transaction test
> DEBUG util.py:439:  Transaction test succeeded.
> DEBUG util.py:439:  Running transaction
> 
> Only the transaction does not appear to be running.  Could somebody
> take a look at that for me, please?  Thank you,

I've freed the task to another builder.

For some reason that machine (it's aarch64-c17n1) has vm's that are
really really slow. I thought we fixed it, but apparently not. ;( I've
disabled those so no builds will happen on them while we try and sort it
out.

kevin




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Build stuck setting up buildroot

[Jerry James]

I started an F27 build this morning:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=979845

Hours later, all arches but 32-bit ARM have finished.  The 32-bit ARM
build appears to be stuck setting up the buildroot.  Build.log shows
that the build hasn't actually started yet, and the last bit of
root.log reads:

DEBUG util.py:439:  Running transaction check
DEBUG util.py:439:  Transaction check succeeded.
DEBUG util.py:439:  Running transaction test
DEBUG util.py:439:  Transaction test succeeded.
DEBUG util.py:439:  Running transaction

Only the transaction does not appear to be running.  Could somebody
take a look at that for me, please?  Thank you,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: ceph build stuck in f27-pending for 12+ hours

[Peter Robinson]

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange  wrote:
> This ceph build finished building in koji 12+ hours ago:
>
>   https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=942742
>
> but it still in f27-pending.  Is there something stuck that prevents
> it going into f27, and thus inherited into f27-build ?

Signing, should be on it's way shortly, something got itself in a twist.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

ceph build stuck in f27-pending for 12+ hours

[Daniel P. Berrange]

This ceph build finished building in koji 12+ hours ago:

  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=942742

but it still in f27-pending.  Is there something stuck that prevents
it going into f27, and thus inherited into f27-build ?

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com  -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: build stuck?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 13:50:47 -0400
Neal Becker  wrote:

> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14421664

Doesn't look so to me... it's running tests on the arm build. 

There's progress, but it's slow. 

kevin


pgp7qZhptflXe.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

build stuck?

[Neal Becker]

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14421664
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org