Re: VOTE RESULT (was Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating))
sent out a RETRY and mentioned the point of obfuscating. On 3/21/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Adam, yes, I know. I haven't heard anything back regarding the obfuscated files. Perhaps it is ok. Anyway, that was the only *real* issue. Rest was like, using old remote-resource-plugin, so that the tests.jar don't contain LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER. Last week, the two broken plugins released new versions. Thx, Matthias On 3/20/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: got feedback from Noel, vote is closed. no release yet. Robert found some issues (almost caused by buggy maven plugins and already fixed here). The other one is the obfuscated JS files don't have the Apache license headers. Waiting on feedback from Robert. Ugh... the whole point of obfuscating is to eliminate unnecessary content in our downloads. It'd really bug me to add overhead to all of our pages to satisfy this legalism. Even worse, the Apache license would show up over and over again, since we append JS files at runtime. -- Adam Thx, Matthias On 3/16/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sent out to the [EMAIL PROTECTED], to get the approval -M On 3/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, thanks for participating on the vote. Here is the result: binding +1: -Bruno Aranda (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member) -Gabrielle Crawford (Trinidad PPMC member) -Simon Lessard (Trinidad PPMC member) -Martin van den Bemt (Mentor of Trinidad / Incubator PMC) -Matthias Wessendorf (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member) non-binding +1: -Matt Cooper (contributor) -Bernd Bohmann (MyFaces PMC) -1: none :) I'll bring up the vote on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list soon. -Matthias On 3/15/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 :) Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hey Martin, I just did an upload of those checksum files to: http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ so, now I would count your vote as a +1 The other thing (commons-logging), I'd like to check for the next release, ok? Thx, Matthias On 3/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/14/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry people for the late response.. -1.. Missing md5/sha1 checkum for tar.gz and zip (the dist_trin_core). If they are added and are ok, I am changing to +1.. haha! you got me :-) Thanks! Maybe wise to add a text that the binary dist is a complete distribution including sources (most of the time you see a separate release for source). No issues here with it all being in one dist though yes, I used the pattern from Tobago, so I followed it ;) Also I rather see incubating-example unpack in it's own directory (no blocker btw, just personal preference, since it messes up my unpacked dist package). Another question : Why is commons-logging version 1.0 included and not a later version ? well,... lemme check, perhaps dependency of a dependency ? :) I'll fix the md5/sha1 thing tomorrow and upload a new dist. -Matthias Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is a distribution available at [2]. Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further
Re: VOTE RESULT (was Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating))
got feedback from Noel, vote is closed. no release yet. Robert found some issues (almost caused by buggy maven plugins and already fixed here). The other one is the obfuscated JS files don't have the Apache license headers. Waiting on feedback from Robert. Thx, Matthias On 3/16/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sent out to the [EMAIL PROTECTED], to get the approval -M On 3/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, thanks for participating on the vote. Here is the result: binding +1: -Bruno Aranda (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member) -Gabrielle Crawford (Trinidad PPMC member) -Simon Lessard (Trinidad PPMC member) -Martin van den Bemt (Mentor of Trinidad / Incubator PMC) -Matthias Wessendorf (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member) non-binding +1: -Matt Cooper (contributor) -Bernd Bohmann (MyFaces PMC) -1: none :) I'll bring up the vote on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list soon. -Matthias On 3/15/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 :) Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hey Martin, I just did an upload of those checksum files to: http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ so, now I would count your vote as a +1 The other thing (commons-logging), I'd like to check for the next release, ok? Thx, Matthias On 3/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/14/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry people for the late response.. -1.. Missing md5/sha1 checkum for tar.gz and zip (the dist_trin_core). If they are added and are ok, I am changing to +1.. haha! you got me :-) Thanks! Maybe wise to add a text that the binary dist is a complete distribution including sources (most of the time you see a separate release for source). No issues here with it all being in one dist though yes, I used the pattern from Tobago, so I followed it ;) Also I rather see incubating-example unpack in it's own directory (no blocker btw, just personal preference, since it messes up my unpacked dist package). Another question : Why is commons-logging version 1.0 included and not a later version ? well,... lemme check, perhaps dependency of a dependency ? :) I'll fix the md5/sha1 thing tomorrow and upload a new dist. -Matthias Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is a distribution available at [2]. Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: VOTE RESULT (was Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating))
vote closed, because of the 72 hours are already over ;-) On 3/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: got feedback from Noel, vote is closed. no release yet. Robert found some issues (almost caused by buggy maven plugins and already fixed here). The other one is the obfuscated JS files don't have the Apache license headers. Waiting on feedback from Robert. Thx, Matthias On 3/16/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sent out to the [EMAIL PROTECTED], to get the approval -M On 3/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, thanks for participating on the vote. Here is the result: binding +1: -Bruno Aranda (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member) -Gabrielle Crawford (Trinidad PPMC member) -Simon Lessard (Trinidad PPMC member) -Martin van den Bemt (Mentor of Trinidad / Incubator PMC) -Matthias Wessendorf (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member) non-binding +1: -Matt Cooper (contributor) -Bernd Bohmann (MyFaces PMC) -1: none :) I'll bring up the vote on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list soon. -Matthias On 3/15/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 :) Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hey Martin, I just did an upload of those checksum files to: http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ so, now I would count your vote as a +1 The other thing (commons-logging), I'd like to check for the next release, ok? Thx, Matthias On 3/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/14/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry people for the late response.. -1.. Missing md5/sha1 checkum for tar.gz and zip (the dist_trin_core). If they are added and are ok, I am changing to +1.. haha! you got me :-) Thanks! Maybe wise to add a text that the binary dist is a complete distribution including sources (most of the time you see a separate release for source). No issues here with it all being in one dist though yes, I used the pattern from Tobago, so I followed it ;) Also I rather see incubating-example unpack in it's own directory (no blocker btw, just personal preference, since it messes up my unpacked dist package). Another question : Why is commons-logging version 1.0 included and not a later version ? well,... lemme check, perhaps dependency of a dependency ? :) I'll fix the md5/sha1 thing tomorrow and upload a new dist. -Matthias Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is a distribution available at [2]. Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: VOTE RESULT (was Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating))
On 3/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: got feedback from Noel, vote is closed. no release yet. Robert found some issues (almost caused by buggy maven plugins and already fixed here). The other one is the obfuscated JS files don't have the Apache license headers. Waiting on feedback from Robert. Ugh... the whole point of obfuscating is to eliminate unnecessary content in our downloads. It'd really bug me to add overhead to all of our pages to satisfy this legalism. Even worse, the Apache license would show up over and over again, since we append JS files at runtime. -- Adam Thx, Matthias On 3/16/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sent out to the [EMAIL PROTECTED], to get the approval -M On 3/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, thanks for participating on the vote. Here is the result: binding +1: -Bruno Aranda (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member) -Gabrielle Crawford (Trinidad PPMC member) -Simon Lessard (Trinidad PPMC member) -Martin van den Bemt (Mentor of Trinidad / Incubator PMC) -Matthias Wessendorf (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member) non-binding +1: -Matt Cooper (contributor) -Bernd Bohmann (MyFaces PMC) -1: none :) I'll bring up the vote on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list soon. -Matthias On 3/15/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 :) Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hey Martin, I just did an upload of those checksum files to: http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ so, now I would count your vote as a +1 The other thing (commons-logging), I'd like to check for the next release, ok? Thx, Matthias On 3/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/14/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry people for the late response.. -1.. Missing md5/sha1 checkum for tar.gz and zip (the dist_trin_core). If they are added and are ok, I am changing to +1.. haha! you got me :-) Thanks! Maybe wise to add a text that the binary dist is a complete distribution including sources (most of the time you see a separate release for source). No issues here with it all being in one dist though yes, I used the pattern from Tobago, so I followed it ;) Also I rather see incubating-example unpack in it's own directory (no blocker btw, just personal preference, since it messes up my unpacked dist package). Another question : Why is commons-logging version 1.0 included and not a later version ? well,... lemme check, perhaps dependency of a dependency ? :) I'll fix the md5/sha1 thing tomorrow and upload a new dist. -Matthias Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is a distribution available at [2]. Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: VOTE RESULT (was Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating))
Hi Adam, yes, I know. I haven't heard anything back regarding the obfuscated files. Perhaps it is ok. Anyway, that was the only *real* issue. Rest was like, using old remote-resource-plugin, so that the tests.jar don't contain LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER. Last week, the two broken plugins released new versions. Thx, Matthias On 3/20/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: got feedback from Noel, vote is closed. no release yet. Robert found some issues (almost caused by buggy maven plugins and already fixed here). The other one is the obfuscated JS files don't have the Apache license headers. Waiting on feedback from Robert. Ugh... the whole point of obfuscating is to eliminate unnecessary content in our downloads. It'd really bug me to add overhead to all of our pages to satisfy this legalism. Even worse, the Apache license would show up over and over again, since we append JS files at runtime. -- Adam Thx, Matthias On 3/16/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sent out to the [EMAIL PROTECTED], to get the approval -M On 3/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, thanks for participating on the vote. Here is the result: binding +1: -Bruno Aranda (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member) -Gabrielle Crawford (Trinidad PPMC member) -Simon Lessard (Trinidad PPMC member) -Martin van den Bemt (Mentor of Trinidad / Incubator PMC) -Matthias Wessendorf (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member) non-binding +1: -Matt Cooper (contributor) -Bernd Bohmann (MyFaces PMC) -1: none :) I'll bring up the vote on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list soon. -Matthias On 3/15/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 :) Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hey Martin, I just did an upload of those checksum files to: http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ so, now I would count your vote as a +1 The other thing (commons-logging), I'd like to check for the next release, ok? Thx, Matthias On 3/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/14/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry people for the late response.. -1.. Missing md5/sha1 checkum for tar.gz and zip (the dist_trin_core). If they are added and are ok, I am changing to +1.. haha! you got me :-) Thanks! Maybe wise to add a text that the binary dist is a complete distribution including sources (most of the time you see a separate release for source). No issues here with it all being in one dist though yes, I used the pattern from Tobago, so I followed it ;) Also I rather see incubating-example unpack in it's own directory (no blocker btw, just personal preference, since it messes up my unpacked dist package). Another question : Why is commons-logging version 1.0 included and not a later version ? well,... lemme check, perhaps dependency of a dependency ? :) I'll fix the md5/sha1 thing tomorrow and upload a new dist. -Matthias Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is a distribution available at [2]. Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf
Re: VOTE RESULT (was Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating))
sent out to the [EMAIL PROTECTED], to get the approval -M On 3/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, thanks for participating on the vote. Here is the result: binding +1: -Bruno Aranda (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member) -Gabrielle Crawford (Trinidad PPMC member) -Simon Lessard (Trinidad PPMC member) -Martin van den Bemt (Mentor of Trinidad / Incubator PMC) -Matthias Wessendorf (Trinidad PPMC member / MyFaces PMC member) non-binding +1: -Matt Cooper (contributor) -Bernd Bohmann (MyFaces PMC) -1: none :) I'll bring up the vote on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list soon. -Matthias On 3/15/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 :) Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hey Martin, I just did an upload of those checksum files to: http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ so, now I would count your vote as a +1 The other thing (commons-logging), I'd like to check for the next release, ok? Thx, Matthias On 3/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/14/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry people for the late response.. -1.. Missing md5/sha1 checkum for tar.gz and zip (the dist_trin_core). If they are added and are ok, I am changing to +1.. haha! you got me :-) Thanks! Maybe wise to add a text that the binary dist is a complete distribution including sources (most of the time you see a separate release for source). No issues here with it all being in one dist though yes, I used the pattern from Tobago, so I followed it ;) Also I rather see incubating-example unpack in it's own directory (no blocker btw, just personal preference, since it messes up my unpacked dist package). Another question : Why is commons-logging version 1.0 included and not a later version ? well,... lemme check, perhaps dependency of a dependency ? :) I'll fix the md5/sha1 thing tomorrow and upload a new dist. -Matthias Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is a distribution available at [2]. Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
+1 :) Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hey Martin, I just did an upload of those checksum files to: http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ so, now I would count your vote as a +1 The other thing (commons-logging), I'd like to check for the next release, ok? Thx, Matthias On 3/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/14/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry people for the late response.. -1.. Missing md5/sha1 checkum for tar.gz and zip (the dist_trin_core). If they are added and are ok, I am changing to +1.. haha! you got me :-) Thanks! Maybe wise to add a text that the binary dist is a complete distribution including sources (most of the time you see a separate release for source). No issues here with it all being in one dist though yes, I used the pattern from Tobago, so I followed it ;) Also I rather see incubating-example unpack in it's own directory (no blocker btw, just personal preference, since it messes up my unpacked dist package). Another question : Why is commons-logging version 1.0 included and not a later version ? well,... lemme check, perhaps dependency of a dependency ? :) I'll fix the md5/sha1 thing tomorrow and upload a new dist. -Matthias Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is a distribution available at [2]. Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
On 3/14/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry people for the late response.. -1.. Missing md5/sha1 checkum for tar.gz and zip (the dist_trin_core). If they are added and are ok, I am changing to +1.. haha! you got me :-) Thanks! Maybe wise to add a text that the binary dist is a complete distribution including sources (most of the time you see a separate release for source). No issues here with it all being in one dist though yes, I used the pattern from Tobago, so I followed it ;) Also I rather see incubating-example unpack in it's own directory (no blocker btw, just personal preference, since it messes up my unpacked dist package). Another question : Why is commons-logging version 1.0 included and not a later version ? well,... lemme check, perhaps dependency of a dependency ? :) I'll fix the md5/sha1 thing tomorrow and upload a new dist. -Matthias Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is a distribution available at [2]. Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
Hey Martin, I just did an upload of those checksum files to: http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ so, now I would count your vote as a +1 The other thing (commons-logging), I'd like to check for the next release, ok? Thx, Matthias On 3/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/14/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry people for the late response.. -1.. Missing md5/sha1 checkum for tar.gz and zip (the dist_trin_core). If they are added and are ok, I am changing to +1.. haha! you got me :-) Thanks! Maybe wise to add a text that the binary dist is a complete distribution including sources (most of the time you see a separate release for source). No issues here with it all being in one dist though yes, I used the pattern from Tobago, so I followed it ;) Also I rather see incubating-example unpack in it's own directory (no blocker btw, just personal preference, since it messes up my unpacked dist package). Another question : Why is commons-logging version 1.0 included and not a later version ? well,... lemme check, perhaps dependency of a dependency ? :) I'll fix the md5/sha1 thing tomorrow and upload a new dist. -Matthias Mvgr, Martin Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is a distribution available at [2]. Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/ -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
+1 binding On 3/9/07, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 3/9/2007 4:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is a distribution available at [2]. Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/
[vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
Hi, I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is a distribution available at [2]. Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/
Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
[X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. -M
Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
[X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 09/03/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. -M
Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
[ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 3/9/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 09/03/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. -M
Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
In all honesty, I haven't had a chance to look at the bits... I'd want to vote +1, but that seems a bit against-the-spirit... -- Adam On 3/9/07, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Matt Cooper wrote: [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 3/9/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 09/03/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. -M
Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
Hey Adam, It's open source. You're not obligated to be involved in everything and every decision :-) On 3/9/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In all honesty, I haven't had a chance to look at the bits... I'd want to vote +1, but that seems a bit against-the-spirit... -- Adam On 3/9/07, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Matt Cooper wrote: [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 3/9/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 09/03/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. -M
Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
phew! :) -- Adam On 3/9/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Adam, It's open source. You're not obligated to be involved in everything and every decision :-) On 3/9/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In all honesty, I haven't had a chance to look at the bits... I'd want to vote +1, but that seems a bit against-the-spirit... -- Adam On 3/9/07, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Matt Cooper wrote: [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 3/9/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 09/03/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. -M
Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
:-) the vote goes at least 72 hours; the time can be used to check the bits and bytes. -M On 3/9/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In all honesty, I haven't had a chance to look at the bits... I'd want to vote +1, but that seems a bit against-the-spirit... -- Adam On 3/9/07, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Matt Cooper wrote: [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 3/9/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 09/03/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. -M -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [vote] release of core (1.0.0-incubating)
[X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. On 3/9/2007 4:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hi, I managed to get some release artifacts published to a stage repo. I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is a distribution available at [2]. Please take a look at the 1.0.0-incubating artifacts and vote if we should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.. Thanks, Matthias [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/
