Re: [aqm] WG status
Hi all, Please note that we also have a talk on TCP Prague scheduled in ICCRG: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda/iccrg/ Cheers, Michael > On 16 Mar 2017, at 15:26, Wesley Eddy <w...@mti-systems.com> wrote: > > I think there are no surprises here, but as there is an IETF meeting coming > up, I wanted to make sure the AQM WG status is clear. > > The final working group document (on CoDel) is now in IETF Last Call, on the > main IETF list. > > AQM does not plan to meet in Chicago, and should be closed down as the CoDel > draft becomes published. HOWEVER, the work on L4S and DualQ that has been > discussed here is continuing in the TSVWG. People that are interested in > this should definitely be joining the TSVWG list and discussing it there: > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg > > TSVWG has agenda time planned in Chicago for L4S, so you may wish to > participate there. > > For any additional or future work on AQM algorithms, implementation, etc., I > think there will be several possible options that can apply depending on what > the work is, including: ICCRG, TSVWG, AD-sponsoring, individual submissions, > etc. As usual, ask the ADs when in doubt :) > > > > ___ > aqm mailing list > aqm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm ___ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
[aqm] WG status
I think there are no surprises here, but as there is an IETF meeting coming up, I wanted to make sure the AQM WG status is clear. The final working group document (on CoDel) is now in IETF Last Call, on the main IETF list. AQM does not plan to meet in Chicago, and should be closed down as the CoDel draft becomes published. HOWEVER, the work on L4S and DualQ that has been discussed here is continuing in the TSVWG. People that are interested in this should definitely be joining the TSVWG list and discussing it there: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg TSVWG has agenda time planned in Chicago for L4S, so you may wish to participate there. For any additional or future work on AQM algorithms, implementation, etc., I think there will be several possible options that can apply depending on what the work is, including: ICCRG, TSVWG, AD-sponsoring, individual submissions, etc. As usual, ask the ADs when in doubt :) ___ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
[aqm] WG status
Hi, a new month, a new status report. First of all, Wes and I as chairs would like to thank the editors who have stepped forward to work on the AQM Evaluation Guideline draft. We are really thankful for their burst of efforts in the last couple weeks! We expect that that a document will be ready for submission into the I-D repository well before cutoff, as an individual draft, so that the WG can see what the state of thinking is currently. Also, once the document is published on datatracker we'd like to encourage active discussion on it. If the submitted -00 draft is felt to have a fairly complete outline of what the current thinking in the WG is, we may be able to ask the WG for formal adoption during this IETF meeting, or shortly thereafter. - WG Milestones: - Submit AQM recommendations to IESG for publication, obsoleting RFC 2309 (Goal: January 2014) - draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation is accepted towards this milestone - http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation/ - the draft has been updated per comments received - if the authors are comfortable, a WGLC might be made on the next revision - we would like to hear from other authors of RFC 2309 on this document, if anyone has contacts to them. - Submit AQM algorithm evaluation guidelines to IESG for publication as Informational (Goal: July 2014) - An editor team has come forth and is working on this - A draft should be available for discussion in the London IETF - We encourage discussion on the list and during the meeting, if this draft should be adopted by the working group. - Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard (Goal: December 2014) - Since any Proposed Standard algorithm should be in line with the recommendations and be passable versus the evaluation guidelines, this milestone is dependend on the progress of the two work items above. - Currently the only algorithm spec with a complete and active individual-submission draft is PIE - Other items: - draft-pan-aqm-pie is under active work as a proposed algorithm: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00.txt, however the draft has expired and should be refreshed. - draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel is expired; Dave Taht or others may revive it and/or describe pairing with FQ/SFQ algorithms: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-01.txt - Other algorithm specifications are welcome! - Though, we are not planning on adopting algorithms until recommendations and evaluation guidelines are mostly stable Richard Scheffenegger ___ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
[aqm] WG status
Hi, as we've entered 2014 and have charter milestones that we're working towards, Richard and I thought it would be good to start periodically sending a status report to the WG mailing list so that we can all keep up with what's going on, and focus our efforts together on the things that need work. Towards that goal, here is a snapshot of where we think the AQM working group is at today, and what the next steps are that people can contribute to: - WG Milestones: - Submit AQM recommendations to IESG for publication, obsoleting RFC 2309 (Goal: January 2014) - draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation is accepted towards this milestone - http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation/ - the draft needs to be updated per comments received, including feedback on the recommendations from the Vancouver meeting - if the authors are comfortable, a WGLC might be made on the next revision - we would like to hear from other authors of RFC 2309 on this document, if anyone has contacts to them. - Submit AQM algorithm evaluation guidelines to IESG for publication as Informational (Goal: July 2014) - We need an editor team to step forward and begin work on this; there was initial work presented in Vancouver, but no draft available or adopted by the working group yet. - It will be difficult to make this milestone, and will push other milestones back, if this work isn't accelerated. - Please express interest to the chairs or on-list - Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard (Goal: December 2014) - Since any Proposed Standard algorithm should be in line with the recommendations and be passable versus the evaluation guidelines, this milestone is hard to start on without significant progress on the previous two. - Currently the only algorithm spec with a complete and active individual-submission draft is PIE - Other items: - draft-pan-aqm-pie is under active work as a proposed algorithm: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00.txt - CoDel draft is expired; Dave Taht or others may revive it and/or describe pairing with FQ/SFQ algorithms: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-01.txt - Other algorithm specifications are welcome! - Though, we are not planning on adopting algorithms until recommendations and evaluation guidelines are mostly stable -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems ___ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
Re: [aqm] WG status
I'm interested in contributing to the evaluation guidelines draft as writer as expressed before, although I won't be able to actively work on this earlier than the second week of Feb'14. Regards, Naeem On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Wesley Eddy w...@mti-systems.com wrote: Hi, as we've entered 2014 and have charter milestones that we're working towards, Richard and I thought it would be good to start periodically sending a status report to the WG mailing list so that we can all keep up with what's going on, and focus our efforts together on the things that need work. Towards that goal, here is a snapshot of where we think the AQM working group is at today, and what the next steps are that people can contribute to: - WG Milestones: - Submit AQM recommendations to IESG for publication, obsoleting RFC 2309 (Goal: January 2014) - draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation is accepted towards this milestone - http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation/ - the draft needs to be updated per comments received, including feedback on the recommendations from the Vancouver meeting - if the authors are comfortable, a WGLC might be made on the next revision - we would like to hear from other authors of RFC 2309 on this document, if anyone has contacts to them. - Submit AQM algorithm evaluation guidelines to IESG for publication as Informational (Goal: July 2014) - We need an editor team to step forward and begin work on this; there was initial work presented in Vancouver, but no draft available or adopted by the working group yet. - It will be difficult to make this milestone, and will push other milestones back, if this work isn't accelerated. - Please express interest to the chairs or on-list - Submit first algorithm specification to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard (Goal: December 2014) - Since any Proposed Standard algorithm should be in line with the recommendations and be passable versus the evaluation guidelines, this milestone is hard to start on without significant progress on the previous two. - Currently the only algorithm spec with a complete and active individual-submission draft is PIE - Other items: - draft-pan-aqm-pie is under active work as a proposed algorithm: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00.txt - CoDel draft is expired; Dave Taht or others may revive it and/or describe pairing with FQ/SFQ algorithms: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-01.txt - Other algorithm specifications are welcome! - Though, we are not planning on adopting algorithms until recommendations and evaluation guidelines are mostly stable -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems ___ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm ___ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
