Re: [Assp-user] assp, the end
Just another opinion - but I too have been stuck on ASSP problems, posted questions, and never got answers. I've learned to live with the problems and just have to weigh the benefits of a broken ASSP installation vs no ASSp installation. I understand the OP's concerns, and understand why he would pull the plug on his ASSP installations... -Original Message- From: Andrew Porter [mailto:a...@defsdoor.org] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 4:45 AM To: ASSP User list Subject: Re: [Assp-user] assp, the end Sounds like your problems are elsewhere. I've never had to reconfirm my subscription, never had any complaints about the help people here give - out of their own good will - and I've ran multiple ASSP instances for donkeys years now without any but minor concerns. At least no one tied you down and forced you to use this completely free software. -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohomanageengine ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user -- What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohomanageengine ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Remove last SMTP hop before processing
I'm setting up ASSP in an environment with an SMTP gateway at the network edge. So, all mail must flow through that SMTP gateway (relay) before hitting ASSP. This messes up a lot of ASSP features like SPF, since everything is arriving at ASSP from an approved SMTP host, but prior hosts may fail SPF. Is there a way to make ASSP ignore the last SMTP hop in the header? (peel it off) and then process based on prior SMTP hops? Thanks -- This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Where are the ASSP headers?
I upgraded from 1.2.x to version 2 of ASSP. And WOW are there a lot more settings (not wow in a good way). I'm trying to tune ASSP to behave as well as my old ver 1.x but I'm missing info. In particular, many messages have hardle any x-assp-* in the header (see example below). Why? Some messages have lots of x-assp info, some little. This is an example of a message that got through and I'm hoping to see what assp thought of it (I've already used the mail analyzer for the body) Thanks Received: from smtp2.netdorm.com (192.168.254.35) by mail.mydomain.com (192.168.254.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.436.0; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:56:51 -0400 Received: from smtp2.netdorm.com ([67.214.175.76] helo=smtp2.netdorm.com) by spamfilter.mydomain.com with ESMTP (2.0.1); 11 May 2011 03:56:43 -0400 Received: from 07C44B438BAE4B6 ([188.191.194.3])by smtp2.netdorm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id p4B7v7Vm010328; Wed, 11 May 2011 03:57:09 -0400 From: Tanya ja...@radiocubelles.net To: nsupp...@mydomain.com nsupp...@mydomain.com Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 04:56:41 -0400 Subject: What's up?.Dictionary for italian luxury watches Thread-Topic: What's up?.Dictionary for italian luxury watches Thread-Index: AcwPsP2pYdnQpVaBSxOyWTOhoJ4o2w== Message-ID: 629190416.20110511101...@asbestos.redwebhouse.com Accept-Language: en-US, en-CA Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: mail.mydomain.com X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-assp-envelope-from: ja...@radiocubelles.net x-assp-version: 2.0.1(2.0.19) on spamfilter.mydomain.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 -- Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Regex help - or am I misunderstanding function?
I'm still getting emails containing links to sites in russia. I have this regex in my BombRe file: http\:\/\/[A-Za-z\.]+?\.(?:ru|ly|nl|ec|cc|vc|ua|in|am)[\s\/\n\r\\] Which according to my (web based) regex testers SHOULD catch the email message below. So, I put it into the mail tester in ASSP and got the analysis below. (I have test mode turned on by the way) Even though the ASSP tester shows 1.000 probability that it's spam, it is NOT getting flagged as spam in the subject line (test mode). As well, should the bobre regex show up as a cause somewhere? I'm confused ---MESSAGE Quench your thirst for thrills - Play at King Spin http://www.net-multi-cazino.ru ---MESSAGE HEADERS--- x-assp-envelope-from: yauu...@alfnucifora.org x-assp-received-spf: none ip=64.182.102.193 mailfrom=yauu...@alfnucifora.org helo=smtp1.netdorm.com x-assp-version: 2.0.1(2.0.19) on spamfilter.mydomain.comm ---ASSP ANALYSIS Bayesian Analysis: • Bayesian Check is disabled Bad Words Bad ProbGood Words Good Prob spin href 0.9998 at king 0.9996 play at 0.9987 href multi 0.9931 king spin 0.9810 href ru 0.9775 href cazino 0.9626 href www0.2390 Totals: 0.9998 0.9996 0.9987 0.9931 0.9810 0.9775 0.9626 0.2390 -- Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Catchall email account
Because of our MTA's limitations (Exchange 2007 all-in-one setup), I am unable to implement a catchall account in Exchange. Does ASSP offer the ability to rewrite the TO address of an email that the MTA refuses (or ASSP determines does not exist), sending it instead to a catchall account? (I'm still on version 1.3.3.1 of ASSP)? Thanks MD - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] How to upgrade
I'm running ASSP 1.2.6 and am thinking about upgrading. Can I find a list of features somewhere to help me decide whether or not to upgrade? As well, is upgrading a complex process? (Or is it a simple install and all settings move over) MD - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Only bad words showing, and wrong ones!
We have encountered an ASSP install in which all mail is being flagged as spam unless it's on the whitelist. To find out why, we took an spam message and run it through the ASSP analyzer. 1. We found the it match many words to bad words, however, the good words column was empty! Why is it not using any good words? 2. We found that the bad words list contained things like data 550 which I assume would be seen in every mail transaction. Why are these appearing? Thanks, MD - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Feature request: catch-all account if validate local address fails
I'm not using the Validate Local Addresses feature - because I didn't want to block valid messages to users with mistyped addresses. (We have two employees with French names, and it's amazing how often senders get it wrong). Unfortunately, upgrading to Exchange 2007 caused us to lose the sink/catchall ability. This sounds like a great feature request...if the Validate Local Addresses feature is turned on, add the option of rewriting the TO address to a catchall account instead of just killing the connection. Thanks, Michelle -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Morris, Nate Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 10:25 AM To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy' Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Creating a catch-all account If you are not using the Validate Local Addresses feature of ASSP, you could get a copy of EVERY message going through ASSP to a single mailbox, but this would be very difficult to manage and is probably a privacy issue. If you are validating local addresses with ASSP, I believe ASSP checks the recipient before it receives the body of the message. If the recipient is not found, it terminates the connection without ever receiving the mail. In other words, messages to invalid recipients can not be redirected because they are never received. Nate - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
Re: [Assp-user] Creating a catch-all account
That KB article is for Exchange 2003 only. Exchange 2007 works very differently. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mirko Scholz Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 3:17 PM To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy' Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Creating a catch-all account Exchange should support catch-alls: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/324021 Mirko - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Creating a catch-all account
My mail server does not support a catch all account, so I'm hoping that ASSP can help out. My mail server is exchange 2007, and cannot support a catch all without a separate edge server (we have a single server). I'm running ASSP 1.2.6 successfully; can I use it to rewrite invalid/non-existent destination accounts to create a catch all ? (Also called account sink)? Thanks, Michelle - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
Re: [Assp-user] ClamAV on Windows w/ASSP on Windows
Can NOD32 be integrated with ASSP (on a Windows machine)? MD -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Marcus Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:16 AM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] ClamAV on Windows w/ASSP on Windows On 5/8/2007 William Stucke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: NOD32 is good. AVG is good (disclaimer: I'm an AVG reseller) for the same reasons, plus centralised downloading, monitoring and control on networks. You say this as if NOD32 didn't have the RAS or RAC... NOD32 rocks - and is much more effective than AVG... and no, I am not a reseller of either one. -- Best regards, Charles - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] ClamAV on Windows w/ASSP on Windows
We've been running ASSP on Windows with great success - actually on the same box as our Exchange 2007. We'd like to get away from Symantec, and hope to experiment with ClamAV on this same windows box. We see that ASSP can integrate with ClamAV, and we found a www.clamwin.com site offering ClamAV for Windows. Has ANYONE here integrates ASSP/win with ClamAV/win ? Can you offer any insights / directions? Thanks, MD - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Need smarthost for outbound?
We struggled on a recent installation of ASSP - which lead to a couple of questions. Hopefully some can shed some light on: 1. Does one need a smarthost for outbound mail? (Or can ASSP handle sending direct to destination MTA) 2. If ASSP listens on only 1 port , how can it distinguish between incoming and outgoing SMTP actions? (Or does relay have to be set) Thanks, MD - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
Re: [Assp-user] Need smarthost for outbound?
We recently setup a client using exchange as follows Internet--ASSP--Exchange And Exchange--ASSP--Internet We put ASSP in the outbound path to allow for the mail interface to work. For some reason, we could not get outbound to work unless we specified a smarthost in ASSP. Then all worked great. We can't figure out why! Ideas? MD -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matti Haack Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:18 PM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Need smarthost for outbound? ASSP is not a mailserver it is only a proxy, which should be positioned before your server MD 1. Does one need a smarthost for outbound mail? (Or can ASSP MD handle sending direct to destination MTA) Your Server will send them directly. There is no need to pass them through ASSP. MD 2. If ASSP listens on only 1 port , how can it distinguish between MD incoming and outgoing SMTP actions? (Or does relay have to be set) ASSP listens only on the incomming. Normally even your users email will be subbmitted by SMTP. So the mailflow is like this: Incomming Mail: internet-assp-YourMailserver-UserMailbox Outgoing Client-assp-YourMailServer-Destination Matti -- Matti Haack - Hit Haack IT Service Gmbh Poltlbauer Weg 4, D-94036 Passau +49 851 50477-22 Fax: +49 851 50477-29 http://www.haack-it.de - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
Re: [Assp-user] How to upgrade from 1.2.6 to 1.3.0?
What about the config file? Are missing entries automatically created with default values (upon installation)? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Borgstedt Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 5:14 PM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] How to upgrade from 1.2.6 to 1.3.0? I would like to upgrade to 1.3.0 (the latest beta), but how is this done? The latest beta is always found at http://www.magicvillage.de/~Fritz_Borgstedt/assp/ Current latest is 1.3.1 http://www.magicvillage.de/~Fritz_Borgstedt/assp/ASSP_1.3.1pb - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] FW: pwlib compile error
I'm trying to compile pwlib, and have followed instructions to the letter. Can anyone help me get past the error below? (I did have the latest openh323 and pwlib on my system before, but did a make clean, removed them, and then downloaded the mimas patch versions) I looks like contain.cxx contains a function defintion for psprintf, but it is not exported in the header files. I don't see how this would ever compile. Thanks MD - set -e; make -C src/ptlib/unix opt; make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/pwlib_Mimas_patch2/src/ptlib/unix' g++ -D_REENTRANT -Wall -fPIC -I/usr/src/pwlib_Mimas_patch2/include -Os -felide-constructors -x c++ -c ../../ptclib/asner.cxx -o /usr/src/pwlib_Mimas_patch2/lib/obj_linux_x86_r/asner.o ../../ptclib/asner.cxx: In member function 'PString PASN_Choice::GetTagName() const': ../../ptclib/asner.cxx:2112: error: 'psprintf' was not declared in this scope make[1]: *** [/usr/src/pwlib_Mimas_patch2/lib/obj_linux_x86_r/asner.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/pwlib_Mimas_patch2/src/ptlib/unix' make: *** [opt] Error 2 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Prefix ????????: in subject
I've gotten a couple of emails with the prefix : in the subject. What does this mean? Is it being added by ASSP? Thanks, MD - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
Re: [Assp-user] Prefix ????????: in subject
These are emails from a client - so they are not spam. My header shows (I X'd out some stuff) below. The Thread-Topic is the right subject text, but the Subject has the strange subject text. I'm guessing ASSP added this...but I don't know why. Ideas? Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Importance: normal Priority: normal Subject: : Locking in Business Strategy X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2826 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:30:02 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Locking in Business Strategy thread-index: AcdUODgtXWGl80BRSGK1JkQ0kSMVYAAKJxFQAAD50ec= From: XX To: X-Assp-Spam-Prob: 0.0 X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes X-Assp-Envelope-From: X-Assp-Intended-For: Return-Path: XXX X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2007 20:40:26.0315 (UTC) FILETIME=[2F7829B0:01C75466] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Woods Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 5:07 PM To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy' Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Prefix : in subject It's a common spam subject line from Russian spam mail. -Original Message- Michelle Dupuis wrote: I've gotten a couple of emails with the prefix : in the subject. What does this mean? Is it being added by ASSP? Check the ASSP maillog and the email headers to see if it was processed by ASSP. My first thought it that no, it is not being added by ASSP. Kevin - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
Re: [Assp-user] Prefix ????????: in subject
My log shows: Feb-19-07 15:40:26 66.231.184.40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] local or whitelisted - (attachments unchecked) _Locking_in_Business_Strategy_ - c:\assp/notspam/149.eml So the questions marks aren't in the subject line at that point. I am in testmode, and using the prefix [SPAM]...so again no question mark. MD -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Brown Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 5:39 PM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Prefix : in subject You've definitely not got anything in the Bayesian Test mode subject suffix? In ASSP's logs, does the subject for the mail have the question marks? James. On 20/02/2007, at 9:30 AM, Michelle Dupuis wrote: These are emails from a client - so they are not spam. My header shows (I X'd out some stuff) below. The Thread-Topic is the right subject text, but the Subject has the strange subject text. I'm guessing ASSP added this...but I don't know why. Ideas? Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Importance: normal Priority: normal Subject: : Locking in Business Strategy X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2826 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:30:02 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Locking in Business Strategy thread-index: AcdUODgtXWGl80BRSGK1JkQ0kSMVYAAKJxFQAAD50ec= From: XX To: X-Assp-Spam-Prob: 0.0 X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes X-Assp-Envelope-From: X-Assp-Intended-For: Return-Path: XXX X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2007 20:40:26.0315 (UTC) FILETIME=[2F7829B0:01C75466] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Woods Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 5:07 PM To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy' Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Prefix : in subject It's a common spam subject line from Russian spam mail. -Original Message- Michelle Dupuis wrote: I've gotten a couple of emails with the prefix : in the subject. What does this mean? Is it being added by ASSP? Check the ASSP maillog and the email headers to see if it was processed by ASSP. My first thought it that no, it is not being added by ASSP. Kevin -- --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php? page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user -- --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php? page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
Re: [Assp-user] Prefix ????????: in subject
That files shows: Subject: : Locking in Business Strategy But does that mean it ARRIVED that way, or ASSP added it? MD -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 8:52 PM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Prefix : in subject Michelle Dupuis wrote: My log shows: Feb-19-07 15:40:26 66.231.184.40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] local or whitelisted - (attachments unchecked) _Locking_in_Business_Strategy_ - c:\assp/notspam/149.eml So the questions marks aren't in the subject line at that point. I am in testmode, and using the prefix [SPAM]...so again no question mark. Check the file that it saved into the notspam directory and see if the question marks show up there. Kevin - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Do we need a blacklist feature?
I've been working with ASSP, and I've wondered if a blacklist feature would be usefull. Whereas the whitelist confirms VALID senders that one wishes to accept, would it be usefull to have a blacklist for VALID senders you wish to refuse? (but later may wish to re-enable) This is based on my assumption that forwarding a message to assp-spam@ tells assp that this TYPE of message is bad, while sending to assp-notspam@ tells assp that this TYPE of message is ok. I would hate to teach ASSP that a certain sender is bad sometimes, but ok other times. Thoughts? MD - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
Re: [Assp-user] Do we need a blacklist feature?
Can't the same be said for the whitelist? If we want the contents, just send it to assp-notspam@ and let ASSP learn this is good email? Then why have a whitelist? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 4:43 PM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Do we need a blacklist feature? Michelle Dupuis wrote: I've been working with ASSP, and I've wondered if a blacklist feature would be usefull. Whereas the whitelist confirms VALID senders that one wishes to accept, would it be usefull to have a blacklist for VALID senders you wish to refuse? (but later may wish to re-enable) What is it you think you would like to accomplish? Either its ham or it spam (or perhaps worthy of no-processing). This is based on my assumption that forwarding a message to assp-spam@ tells assp that this TYPE of message is bad, while sending to assp-notspam@ tells assp that this TYPE of message is ok. Either you want it or you dont. How can a source be valid yet you wish to block them? I would hate to teach ASSP that a certain sender is bad sometimes, but ok other times. If there are certain things that come in that you dont want to get into your ham corpus, then perhaps you should look into the no-processing features. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Regex help - false positive
This isn't purely an ASSP question...but hopefully someone can help. I grabbed the Bomb regex samples from the ASSP web site, to improve my filtering. One group of regex's trap for bank fraud spam, as follows: (bank|credit|ebay|pal|security|union|YOUR_ORG) (antivirus|support|team)# phishing (bank|credit|ebay|pal|security|union).*?(account|) ?activity ((in|on|with) your (account|identity|record))# phishing (bank|credit|ebay|pal|security|union).*?(activate|authorize|confirm|verify) (the|your) (account|authenticity|identity|information|records)# phishing (bank|credit|ebay|pal|security|union).*?(close|update) (and verify |)your (account|information)#phishing (bank|credit|ebay|pal|security|union).*?(could be|has|info(rmation|)is|may have|was|will be) (be|been|) ?(temporar(ily|ly|y)|used for|will|) ?(be|been|) ?(accessed|deactivated|deleted (bank|credit|ebay|pal|security|union).*?(flagged|limit(ed|)|suspend(ed|)|unv erified) (your |).*?account(?!s| executive)#phishing (bank|credit|ebay|pal|security|union).*?confirm(ation|) (now|on|of) (customer(s|)|your) (data|information)# phishing (bank|credit|ebay|pal|security|union).*?result in account (deletion|erasure|removal|suspension)# phishing These regex's appear to have incorrectly trapped a user with name bank.lavika.se - obviously the workd bank. From what I've learned of RegEx, none of the above SHOULD trap this: X-Assp-Spam-Reason: BombRe: 'bank.lavika.se (skar' Can someone see which regex is catching the above and why? Thanks, MD - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Feature request: Strip first received line of header
I would like to throw out a feature request - which sounds (based on my little knowledge) like and easy fix/implementation. Users like me have all inbound mail route through an ISP. This adds one received line to the top of the header file. The problem is, that this line makes it impossible to use the great RTBL feature. How about adding a pre-processing option to strip the first received line? Thanks, MD - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
Re: [Assp-user] Feature request: Strip first received line of header
A lot of companies are using 3rd part services as a backup MX (queuing) for disaster recovery etc; so mail is routed through that ISP. You're right about stripping off the first received line can be handled differently - perhaps the RTBL processing can match all IP addresses within the header? MD -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 12:42 PM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Feature request: Strip first received line of header Michelle Dupuis wrote: I would like to throw out a feature request - which sounds (based on my little knowledge) like and easy fix/implementation. Users like me have all inbound mail route through an ISP. This adds one received line to the top of the header file. The problem is, that this line makes it impossible to use the great RTBL feature. How about adding a pre-processing option to strip the first received line? Ok, first off ASSP does not use the headers for the DNSBL scanning, it uses the connecting IP address. Second, thats a very very bad idea to try to strip connection headers, not only does it pretty much make troubleshooting impossible it's improper behavior for something like ASSP much less an MTA. If you really want to use the DNSBL blocking I suggest you change your incoming mail configuration. Why would you route incoming mail through the ISP anyways? Kevin - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
Re: [Assp-user] 1.2.7(final) ASSP Perl process hanging w/ 100% CPUfor about 1-
Sorry - clumsy fingers. Back to ASSP Perl process hanging w/ 100% CPUfor about 1- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 12:44 PM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] 1.2.7(final) ASSP Perl process hanging w/ 100% CPUfor about 1- Michelle Dupuis wrote: Ok - my lack of knowledge here My ISP adds one received line to the header. Perhaps and option for home many received's to strip off the top? As for ASSP, could it be an option to use the connection IP or the header IP? MD Please don't thread-jack. Start a new topic. Kevin - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] In test mode but no subject changes?
I have checked off every test mode button (and applied changes), but none of my incoming email has anything prepended to the subject line. Am I misunderstanding the purpose of test mode? What should this do? Thanks, MD - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Is my blocked mail missing?
I have a new ASSP installation, mostly at defaults. After 1/2 day of running, my stats show (see below) 17.6% non-local mail blocked. However, the \spam folder is empty. Where are these blocked messages going? I want to confirm they are truly spam! (I'm running in test mode - all boxes checked - in case that matters) Thanks, MD ASSP Proxy Uptime: 0.460 days 0.775 days Messages Processed: 130 (282.4 per day) 201 (259.3 per day) Non-Local Mail Blocked: 17.6% 16.8% CPU Usage: 0.00% (0.10% avg) 0.08% avg Concurrent SMTP Sessions:0 (3 max) 3 max - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
Re: [Assp-user] In test mode but no subject changes?
Sorry for that confusion, I meant ENABLED/CHECKED. I tried adding the word [SPAM] to the Prepend spam subject field, and message which are obviously spam are having their subjects prepended with this word. However, isn't test mode supposed to prepend something on its own? Thanks, MD -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Marcus Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 11:22 AM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] In test mode but no subject changes? Michelle Dupuis wrote: I have checked off every test mode button (and applied changes), but none of my incoming email has anything prepended to the subject line. Am I misunderstanding the purpose of test mode? What should this do? When you say 'checked off' - do you mean ENABLED/CHECKED, or DISABLED/UNCHECKED? It sounds like you mean DISABLED - so, in that case, the messages that get through are considered ham (not spam), and so are not tagged. The purpose of test mode is to not block ANY mail, but to simply tag it... -- Best regards, Charles - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Should rebuildspamdb.pl clear out directories?
After a day of testing, I have a reasonable sample of message in the \notspam and \error\spam directories. I ran the rebuildspamdb.pl script (I think it was succesfull), but I see my directories still contain the .eml and .rpt files. Are these directories going to grow indefinately? Do I have to clear them out manually? Thanks, MD - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] How us RTBL if inbound mail via ISP MX
Our company's email arrives at our SMTP server from a single host (our ISP's backup mail server). Since they don't offer RTBL filtering, I would like to try to do the same. For this reason, all inbound SMTP connections come from 1 IP addresses. Is there a way to apply the RBL to IP addresses in the header - any step along the SMTP chain? (As opposed to just checking the remote IP at time of SMTP connection)? Thanks, MD - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] Understanding log entries
I have a couple of log entries that I need help with. The first is: 66.231.184.40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Regex:Red 'Unsubscribe' What does the Regex:Red 'Unsubscribe' mean? Which regex is matching this message? The next is: Feb-11-07 19:43:40 66.231.184.40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] passing if safe because testmode, otherwise Bayesian spam Again from the same list source; I assume in this case I would just forward the message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain and it will no longer be trapper? Thanks, Michelle - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
[Assp-user] FW: Why is this ASSP bouncing this message to a fake sender?
My assp setup (running in test mode) received a message which is confusing mesee below. It was FROM revenuemanagement.com, showing that a message with the subject [SPAM] deign out-of-bounds was rejected and bounced back to me. My ASSP is setup to prefix [SPAM] on the subject line of spam messages, so it appears that my system added [SPAM] to the subject line when the message first arrived, and THEN sent it back to the (fake) sender, who then bounced it back to me. Why would ASSP add [SPAM] and then bounce it to the fake sender (who bounced it back to me)? I'm confused MD -Original Message- From: System Administrator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 7:43 PM To: Postmaster Subject: Undeliverable: [SPAM] deign out-of-bounds Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SPAM] deign out-of-bounds Sent:Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:21:39 -0500 did not reach the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:21:39 -0500 The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient directly to find out the correct address. mail.revenuemanagement.com #5.1.1 - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
Re: [Assp-user] Understanding log entries
Its getting clearer - but I'm still a bit confused. According to the docs (and the ASSP web interface), the redlist is a list of email addresses which cannot add to the spam/nospam list. But, looking at the redre.txt file it is clearly a bunch of regex expressions. So my questions are: 1. Does a match from the redre.txt file cause the message to be blocked/accepted? If neither, why is it even showing up in the log? (Or is this just an FYI) 2. What should I put in the redlist? Should I be trying to match text in the headers of the various usenet groups/lists I subscribe too? And/or, should I add email addresses of users who should not add to the spam/nospam list? Thanks, MD -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Wright Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 8:32 PM To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Understanding log entries 1. Regex:Red means that the message was matched against the Regular Expression (RegEx) you have in your Expression to Identify Redlisted Mail* section. 2. Its considered Bayesian spam, so your system needs to be taught that it incorrectly analysed the message by sending it to your Not Spam email interface. So yes, sending to your assp-notspam would be the right thing to do. Others may suggest you configure your mailing lists to be checked differently (or not checked at all) from 'normal' email. I don't have a problem with my users/mail lists so I haven't had reason to look into that yet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:assp-user- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michelle Dupuis Sent: Monday, 12 February 2007 11:58 AM To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy' Subject: [Assp-user] Understanding log entries I have a couple of log entries that I need help with. The first is: 66.231.184.40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Regex:Red 'Unsubscribe' What does the Regex:Red 'Unsubscribe' mean? Which regex is matching this message? The next is: Feb-11-07 19:43:40 66.231.184.40 asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] passing if safe because testmode, otherwise Bayesian spam Again from the same list source; I assume in this case I would just forward the message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain and it will no longer be trapper? Thanks, Michelle --- -- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as- us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
