Re: question about Islam

2006-05-08 Thread Gilberto Simpson

Don,

I've heard something like that before in previous discussions with
Bahais. I just think I have a philosophical disagreement with the idea
of progressive revelation. I think that genuine moral principles
shouldn't change with time.

And in terms of the issue of slavery, if I remember correctly, one of
the Bahai texts prohibiting slavery explains that slavery is wrong
because it is a violation of human nature or human dignity. If that's
the case, then it has always been true, and slavery has always been
wrong. But the problem with that position would be that slavery would
be wrong even when it was condoned by previous prophets.


-G

On 5/8/06, Don Calkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

At 9:32 PM -0400 5/7/06, Gilberto Simpson wrote:

Except the Bab and Bahaullah both owned slaves.


If I remember correctly, there is a statement by Abdu'l-Baha that
Baha'u'llah released all slaves when he became head of the family,
and that most promptly left.

Don C

--

-.-.-.-.-
He who believes himself spiritual proves he is not.





The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




--
There are no poets

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: question about Islam

2006-05-08 Thread Iskandar Hai, M.D.
On Sun, 7 May 2006, Gilberto Simpson wrote:

 On 5/5/06, Tim Nolan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Hello  Janine,
   He feels that the Bahai faith is just a
   reiteration of Islam, nothing new.
 
 I don't like absolute claims and so I probably wouldn't say that there
 is *nothing* new. But the Bahai faith and the Babi faiths definitely
 had antecedents within Islam. (most immediately, there was the Shaykhi
 movement for instance) The Bahai faith didn't spring out of a vacuum.
 
 

It's true that the Baha'i Faith did not spring out of a vaccum. Neither
did Islam nor any other religion for that matter. Religion, or the
Revelation of God, is a continuum. 

 
  Baha'u'llah forbids religious warfare, Muhammad
  did not forbid this.
 
 The Bahai writings allow for something called righteous warfare and
 I've never heard a convincing explanation for how it is significantly
 different from other just war theories in a moral sense.
 
 -G
 

Warfare conducted in the name of religion and/or conducted to covert
others into your religion is prohibited in the Baha'i Faith. 
Righteous warfare or just war is a totally different issue. Neither the
motivation nor the purpose is religious. 

Iskandar





 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: question about Islam

2006-05-08 Thread Iskandar Hai, M.D.
On Sun, 7 May 2006, Gilberto Simpson wrote:

 
  cannot
  practice bigamy, have a clear cut prohibition against slavery,
 
 Except the Bab and Bahaullah both owned slaves.
 
 -G
 

The Bab and Baha'u'llah had slaves because They bought them under Islamic
Dispensation shari`ah law before the onset of the Baha'i Dispensation when
slavery was not forbidden by Islam. 

Iskandar 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: question about Islam

2006-05-08 Thread Gilberto Simpson

On 5/8/06, Iskandar Hai, M.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On Sun, 7 May 2006, Gilberto Simpson wrote:



 I don't like absolute claims and so I probably wouldn't say that there
 is *nothing* new. But the Bahai faith and the Babi faiths definitely
 had antecedents within Islam. (most immediately, there was the Shaykhi
 movement for instance) The Bahai faith didn't spring out of a vacuum.



It's true that the Baha'i Faith did not spring out of a vaccum. Neither
did Islam nor any other religion for that matter. Religion, or the
Revelation of God, is a continuum.


I don't have a problem with you saying that. But I didn't go onto a
Muslim e-mail list trying to disprove someone who said that Islam has
nothing new. In fact, I think I've pointed out here before that the
Quran itself says:

[41.43] Naught is said to you {Muhammad} but what was said indeed to
the apostles before you.

But that doesn't seem like progressive revelation where the prophets
actually *do* bring new things from time to time.


  Baha'u'llah forbids religious warfare, Muhammad
  did not forbid this.


Gilberto:

 The Bahai writings allow for something called righteous warfare and
 I've never heard a convincing explanation for how it is significantly
 different from other just war theories in a moral sense.




Warfare conducted in the name of religion and/or conducted to covert
others into your religion is prohibited in the Baha'i Faith.


And the Quran says that there is no compulsion in matters of
religion. Jihad, properly understood, is not about converting other
people at the edge of the sword. It is about protecting people from
harm.

-Gilberto




The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Morals: of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior

2006-05-08 Thread Sandra







The second 
part of the Religion of God, which refers to the material world, and which 
comprises fasting, prayer, forms of worship, marriage and divorce, the abolition 
of slavery, legal processes, transactions, indemnities for murder, violence, 
theft and injuries -- this part of the Law of God, which refers to material 
things, is modified and altered in each prophetic cycle in accordance with the 
necessities of the times.
 
(Abdu'l-Baha, Some Answered Questions, p. 47)

Among the most 
contentious of such issues in understanding society's evolution towards 
spiritual maturity has been that of crime and punishment. While different in 
detail and degree, the penalties prescribed by most sacred texts for acts of 
violence against either the commonweal or the rights of other individuals tended 
to be harsh. Moreover, they frequently extended to permitting retaliation 
against the offenders by the injured parties or by members of their families. In 
the perspective of history, however, one may reasonably ask what practical 
alternatives existed. In the absence not merely of present-day programmes of 
behavioural modification, but even of recourse to such coercive options as 
prisons and policing agencies, religion's concern was to impress indelibly on 
general consciousness the moral unacceptability-and practical costs-of conduct 
whose effect would otherwise have been to demoralize efforts at social progress. 
The whole of civilization has since been the beneficiary, and it would be less 
than honest not to acknowledge the fact.

So it has been 
throughout all of the religious dispensations whose origins have survived in 
written records. Mendicancy, slavery, autocracy, conquest, ethnic prejudices and 
other undesirable features of social interaction have gone unchallenged-or been 
explicitly indulged-as religion sought to achieve reformations of behaviour that 
were considered more immediately essential at given stages in the advance of 
civilization. To condemn religion because any one of its successive 
dispensations failed to address the whole range of social wrongs would be to 
ignore everything that has been learned about the nature of human development. 
Inevitably, anachronistic thinking of this kind must also create severe 
psychological handicaps in appreciating and facing the requirements of one's own 
time.

The issue is 
not the past, but the implications for the present. Problems arise where 
followers of one of the world's faiths prove unable to distinguish between its 
eternal and transitory features, and attempt to impose on society rules of 
behaviour that have long since accomplished their purpose. The principle is 
fundamental to an understanding of religion's social role: "The remedy the world 
needeth in its present-day afflictions can never be the same as that which a 
subsequent age may require", Bah'u'llh points out. "Be anxiously concerned 
with the needs of the age ye live in, and centre your deliberations on its 
exigencies and requirements."

 
(Commissioned by The Universal House of Justice, One Common Faith p. 
29)







The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.






__







You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com

Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st

Baha'i Studies is available through the following:

Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu

Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st

News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st

Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist

Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net

New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu






Servants in the Households of Bahá'u'lláh and the Bab

2006-05-08 Thread Sandra







MEMORANDUM

From: Research DepartmentTo: The 
Universal House of Justice

2 February 2000

Servants in the Households of Bah'u'llh and the Bab

The Research Department as considered the questions raised by Mr. Peter 
Terry, in his email message of 2 December 1999. Mr. Terry states that on some 
Internet discussion groups there is a discussion on the personal status of 
Mubarak, Isfandiyar and other Ethiopian servants in the households of the Bb 
and Bah'u'llh (and other believers). Mr. Terry...states that "it has been 
alleged that the Guardian and the Universal House of Justice deliberately" 
concealed information on the status of the servants. Mr. Terry requests that he 
be sent information relevant to the above, or that a statement be prepared by 
the Research Department "in response to these allegations". We reply as 
follows.

By way of introduction, we note that, as Mr. Terry is no doubt aware, the 
Bah' Faith is the first religion to explicitly ban slavery in its Sacred 
Scripture. Bah'u'llh prohibited this practice in clear and unambiguous 
language. In the Kitb-i-Aqdas (paragraph 72), it is stated:

It is forbidden you to trade in slaves, be they men or women. It is not for 
him who is himself a servant to buy another of God's servants, and this hath 
been prohibited in His Holy Tablet. Thus, by His mercy, hath the commandment 
been recorded by the Pen of justice. Let no man exalt himself above another; all 
are but bondslaves before the Lord, and all exemplify the truth that there is 
none other God but Him. He, verily, is the All-Wise, Whose wisdom encompasseth 
all things.
Returning to Mr. Terry's questions regarding the lives of servants of 
African descent in the households of Bah'u'llh and the Bb, we note that very 
little is known on the subject, and the information available is highly 
fragmentary and anecdotal in nature. Currently, the only work on this subject is 
Abu'l-Qasim Afnan's Black Pearls: Servants in the Households of the Bb and 
Bah'u'llh (Los Angeles: Kalimat Press, 1988). In addition, we have found 
references to servants of the Holy Family in the following works:

The Promulgation of Universal Peace: Talks Delivered by 'Abdu'l-Bah during 
His Visit to the United States and Canada in 1912 (Wilmette: Bah' Publishing 
Trust, 1995). On pages 426-427, 'Abdu'l-Bah recounts the services of 
Isfandiyar, and praises his character and his loyalty to the Holy 
Family.
The Dawn-Breakers: Nabil's Narrative of the Early Days of the Bah' 
Revelation (Wilmette: Bah' Publishing Trust, 1996). Several references to 
Mubarak are found in this work, including his role in the first days of the 
Declaration of the Bb and his services to the Bb during His pilgrimage to 
Mecca. See pages 53-54, 62, 66, 68, 96, 129, 132-133 and 148.
An article entitled "The Sterling Faithfulness of Esfandayar [sic], Story 
told by 'Abdu'l-Bah: From the Diary of Mirza Ahmad Sohrab, October 25, 1913" 
appears in Star of the West, volume 9 (April 28, 1918), number 3 (pages 38-39), 
and recounts the services of Isfandiyar to the Holy Family, his character and 
the love of 'Abdu'l-Bah for him.
The Chosen Highway (Wilmette: Bah' Publishing Trust, 1967) contains 
recollections of the Greatest Holy Leaf concerning the loyalty to the Holy 
Family of Isfandiyar and a woman of African descent (pages 41 and 43).
Mahmud's Diary: The Diary of Mirza Mahmud-i-Zarqani Chronicling 
'Abdu'l-Bah's Journey to America (Oxford: George Ronald, 1998) contains two 
remarks of 'Abdu'l-Bah praising Isfandiyar (pages 367, 384).
A Gift of Love Offered to the Greatest Holy Leaf (Gloria Faizi, 1982), by 
Hand of the Cause Abu'l-Qasim Faizi, includes a brief summary of the character 
of Isfandiyar and his services to the Holy Family (pages 14-16).
Specifically, with respect to the "personal status" of the servants of the 
families of Bah'u'llh and the Bb, we note below, for the benefit of Mr. 
Terry, a few observations from a perusal of the sources mentioned above:

All the above accounts testify to the love and affection that existed 
between the families of Bah'u'llh and the Bb, on the one hand, and the 
servants in their households, and to the consideration shown to the servants. 
The relationship seems to transcend those ordinarily encountered in 
master-servant interactions.
The reference to the legal status of the servants in the household of the 
Bb is in Black Pearls, where Abu'l-Qasim Afnan states that Mubarak and a female 
servant named Fiddih were acquired by the Bb (pages 4-5, 21). Afnan further 
states that "the bill of purchase" for Mubarak "still exists among the Bb's 
business accounts." We note that this document is not held in the Archives at 
the Bah' World Centre, and this matter will no doubt be researched further in 
the future.
We have found no indication that any of the servants in the household of 
Bah'u'llh were slaves. The only information we have found on this subject is 
the following extract from a talk of 

Re: question about Islam

2006-05-08 Thread Gilberto Simpson

The value of human freedom and autonomy didn't magically change in
1844 (or whatever year Bahais say this particular rule changed). If
slavery is definitely and clearly wrong now in any meaningful sense,
then it was also wrong when Muhammad permitted it (audhibillah). And
if slavery was actually okay back then, then it is possible to justify
some form of it even today.

What rubs me the wrong way is a kind of Simon Says approach to
morality where there are no underlying principles besides whatever
the manifestation says goes.

Even before the Bab and Bahaullah, people in the West were questioning
the morality of slavery. And even in the prophet's time there were
certain standards and principles to encourage good treatment and to
encourage the emancipation of slaves.

-Gilberto

On 5/8/06, Iskandar Hai, M.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Sun, 7 May 2006, Gilberto Simpson wrote:


  cannot
  practice bigamy, have a clear cut prohibition against slavery,

 Except the Bab and Bahaullah both owned slaves.

 -G


The Bab and Baha'u'llah had slaves because They bought them under Islamic
Dispensation shari`ah law before the onset of the Baha'i Dispensation when
slavery was not forbidden by Islam.

Iskandar





The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu




--
There are no poets

__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: question about Islam

2006-05-08 Thread Gilberto Simpson

On 5/8/06, Richard H. Gravelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


- Original Message -
From: Gilberto Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: question about Islam



Gilberto wrote:
. I think that genuine moral principles
shouldn't change with time.


Richard:

Wouldn't you agree Gilberto, that all that is good comes from
God?  If then, genuine moral principles are good, they issued  from God.  
Has he not said that He abrogates what He pleases?


Gilberto:
Does that mean that anything goes? Would it be possible for one year
that stealing and raping and murdering are wrong and the next year,
they become virtuous acts? Why or why not?


Peace

Gilberto




The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: question about Islam

2006-05-08 Thread Iskandar Hai, M.D.
This is an old question and Muslim theologians have debated it for
centuries and non-Musllim philosophers have also debated it for millenia;
my understanding is that what is or is not a commendable or a condemnable
action is dependent upon the Will of God at any particular time/place. So,
at some point in time, owning slaves or having multiple wives was not
condemnable. Now, they are. 

Things didn't magically change in 1844, nor in 610, nor in year 30. Think
continuum. 

Iskandar

On Mon, 8 May 2006, Gilberto Simpson wrote:

 The value of human freedom and autonomy didn't magically change in
 1844 (or whatever year Bahais say this particular rule changed). If
 slavery is definitely and clearly wrong now in any meaningful sense,
 then it was also wrong when Muhammad permitted it (audhibillah). And
 if slavery was actually okay back then, then it is possible to justify
 some form of it even today.
 
 What rubs me the wrong way is a kind of Simon Says approach to
 morality where there are no underlying principles besides whatever
 the manifestation says goes.
 
 Even before the Bab and Bahaullah, people in the West were questioning
 the morality of slavery. And even in the prophet's time there were
 certain standards and principles to encourage good treatment and to
 encourage the emancipation of slaves.
 
 -Gilberto
 
 On 5/8/06, Iskandar Hai, M.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sun, 7 May 2006, Gilberto Simpson wrote:
 
  
cannot
practice bigamy, have a clear cut prohibition against slavery,
  
   Except the Bab and Bahaullah both owned slaves.
  
   -G
  
 
  The Bab and Baha'u'llah had slaves because They bought them under Islamic
  Dispensation shari`ah law before the onset of the Baha'i Dispensation when
  slavery was not forbidden by Islam.
 
  Iskandar
 
 
 



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: question about Islam

2006-05-08 Thread Iskandar Hai, M.D.
On Mon, 8 May 2006, Gilberto Simpson wrote:

 On 5/8/06, Iskandar Hai, M.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Sun, 7 May 2006, Gilberto Simpson wrote:
 
 
Baha'u'llah forbids religious warfare, Muhammad
did not forbid this.
 
 Gilberto:
   The Bahai writings allow for something called righteous warfare and
   I've never heard a convincing explanation for how it is significantly
   different from other just war theories in a moral sense.
 
 
  Warfare conducted in the name of religion and/or conducted to covert
  others into your religion is prohibited in the Baha'i Faith.
 
 And the Quran says that there is no compulsion in matters of
 religion. Jihad, properly understood, is not about converting other
 people at the edge of the sword. It is about protecting people from
 harm.
 
 -Gilberto
 
 
Oh, I very much like your interpretation, Gilberto. I wish that all Muslim
leaders, thinkers, rulers, jurists, theologians, etc. of the past 14
centuries and now had adopted your interpreation or something very much
like it. We would have had a much much better world than what we now have. 

Iskandar



 
 
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) 
is sent by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be 
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The 
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts 
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and 
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
 
 
__
 

You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: question about Islam

2006-05-08 Thread Gilberto Simpson

On 5/8/06, Iskandar Hai, M.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Mon, 8 May 2006, Gilberto Simpson wrote:

 On 5/8/06, Iskandar Hai, M.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I:

  Warfare conducted in the name of religion and/or conducted to covert
  others into your religion is prohibited in the Baha'i Faith.


G:

 And the Quran says that there is no compulsion in matters of
 religion. Jihad, properly understood, is not about converting other
 people at the edge of the sword. It is about protecting people from
 harm.


I:

Oh, I very much like your interpretation, Gilberto. I wish that all Muslim
leaders, thinkers, rulers, jurists, theologians, etc. of the past 14
centuries and now had adopted your interpreation or something very much
like it.


G: It's not just my interpretation. And I don't need backhanded praise.

-G




The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu


Re: question about Islam

2006-05-08 Thread Gilberto Simpson

On 5/8/06, Iskandar Hai, M.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Things didn't magically change in 1844, nor in 610, nor in year 30. Think
continuum.


I do think in terms of continuum. That's why I don't think that a new
Manifestation who will change things around is all that necessary.
While remaining faithful to Islam, the rulings of scholars will take
new realities into account.

So, for example, without banning polygamy, there are certainly Muslims
who are cautious about it and aren't encouraging it.

-Gilberto




The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto (e-mail) is sent 
by the Johnson County Community College (JCCC) and is intended to be confidential and 
for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The information may be protected by 
federal and state privacy and disclosures acts or other legal rules. If the reader of this message 
is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail message 
and any attachments thereto. Thank you.


__


You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu