Bug#547503: git-core: git clone fails on armel
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:09:49PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: I doubt even that, though. If there's interest I can try again with the old kernel, otherwise we can just close this bug. Please do try it. Confirmed, it still breaks with the old kernel (2.6.31-rc9-flatty-ocf-1-00293-g53a104c), but works with the current one (2.6.32-rc4-flatty-ocf-1-00488-g4b69b78). The only possibly relevant kernel change I could find was commit 5a3a29f (ARM: 5691/1: fix cache aliasing issues between kmap() and kmap_atomic() with highmem, commit 7929eb9 upstream) from 2.6.31.1. So though I also have my doubts, we _could_ be lucky. I'd prefer not to track this down to a specific commit as this is a production server now, but can try if you convince me there's some benefit. Can rule out my own patches, though, since they haven't changed between the two kernels (only been rebased). CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#547503: git-core: git clone fails on armel
Sascha Silbe wrote: Confirmed, it still breaks with the old kernel (2.6.31-rc9-flatty-ocf-1-00293-g53a104c), but works with the current one (2.6.32-rc4-flatty-ocf-1-00488-g4b69b78). Thanks! The only possibly relevant kernel change I could find was commit 5a3a29f (ARM: 5691/1: fix cache aliasing issues between kmap() and kmap_atomic() with highmem, commit 7929eb9 upstream) from 2.6.31.1. So though I also have my doubts, we _could_ be lucky. I'd prefer not to track this down to a specific commit as this is a production server now, but can try if you convince me there's some benefit. That's okay. I don't think you should bother. I am satisfied, because now it's clear (1) the problem was in the kernel, (2) the problem is actually fixed (not just a change in what the remote repos were serving, for example), and (3) there was at least one kernel change meant to address similar problems. It would be lovely to confirm on some other machine that reverting that patch introduces the errors, but even that does not seem necessary to me. Can rule out my own patches, though, since they haven't changed between the two kernels (only been rebased). Thanks for tracking this down. Pleased, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#547503: git-core: git clone fails on armel
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:29:18AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: mv78x00: git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git sugar-jhbuild [...] Works fine for me now as well: sascha.si...@flatty:~/y$ git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git sugar-jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sascha.silbe/y/sugar-jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 4728, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2095/2095), done. remote: Total 4728 (delta 2795), reused 4376 (delta 2577) Receiving objects: 100% (4728/4728), 1.87 MiB | 545 KiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (2795/2795), done. sascha.si...@flatty:~/y$ Whatever it was, it seems fixed. Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-rc9-flatty-ocf-1-00293-g53a104c (PREEMPT) Whats this kernel? Which CPU and machine is it on? Zlib is heavily used throughout debian, so any breakage should have been noted before by others. This is on OpenRD-Base with a custom kernel. The only two changes (vs. the mainline kernel) that might have been relevant at all to this bug are: - apply cpu_idle IRQ fix from http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/40871/ - apply OCF patch http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ocf-linux/ocf-linux/20090901/ocf-linux-26-20090901.patch.gz I doubt even that, though. If there's interest I can try again with the old kernel, otherwise we can just close this bug. CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#547503: git-core: git clone fails on armel
Hi again, Sascha Silbe wrote: Works fine for me now as well: sascha.si...@flatty:~/y$ git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git sugar-jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sascha.silbe/y/sugar-jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 4728, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2095/2095), done. remote: Total 4728 (delta 2795), reused 4376 (delta 2577) Receiving objects: 100% (4728/4728), 1.87 MiB | 545 KiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (2795/2795), done. sascha.si...@flatty:~/y$ Whatever it was, it seems fixed. That’s too bad. This is on OpenRD-Base with a custom kernel. The only two changes (vs. the mainline kernel) that might have been relevant at all to this bug are: - apply cpu_idle IRQ fix from http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/40871/ - apply OCF patch http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ocf-linux/ocf-linux/20090901/ocf-linux-26-20090901.patch.gz I doubt even that, though. If there's interest I can try again with the old kernel, otherwise we can just close this bug. Please do try it. Also (I know I’m pushing my luck here) if you still have the old libc package around, could you try with that? It would be nice to understand what went wrong here, so we can avoid it breaking again. The only possibly relevant kernel change I could find was commit 5a3a29f (ARM: 5691/1: fix cache aliasing issues between kmap() and kmap_atomic() with highmem, commit 7929eb9 upstream) from 2.6.31.1. So though I also have my doubts, we _could_ be lucky. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#547503: git-core: git clone fails on armel
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 07:14:25PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Hi arm porters, Can you reproduce this problem? If so, any ideas on how to fix it? mv78x00: git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git sugar-jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /schroot/sugar-jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 4728, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2095/2095), done. remote: Total 4728 (delta 2798), reused 4376 (delta 2577) Receiving objects: 100% (4728/4728), 1.87 MiB | 206 KiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (2798/2798), done. mv78x00: git clone git://git.gnome.org/jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /schroot/jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 20162, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (6726/6726), done. remote: Total 20162 (delta 15845), reused 16820 (delta 13378) Receiving objects: 100% (20162/20162), 3.52 MiB | 118 KiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (15845/15845), done. mv78x00: At the original report: Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-rc9-flatty-ocf-1-00293-g53a104c (PREEMPT) Whats this kernel? Which CPU and machine is it on? Zlib is heavily used throughout debian, so any breakage should have been noted before by others. Versions of packages git-core depends on: ii libc6 2.9-25 GNU C Library: Shared libraries Seems you have quite old sqeeze setup. Can you try updating? Gerrit Pape wrote: On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 02:08:20PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: git clone fails on my Debian armel system: sascha.si...@flatty:~$ git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git sugar-jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sascha.silbe/sugar-jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 4772, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2079/2079), done. error: inflate: data stream error (invalid distance too far back) fatal: pack has bad object at offset 616818: inflate returned -3 fatal: index-pack failed sascha.si...@flatty:~$ git clone git://git.gnome.org/jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sascha.silbe/jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 19804, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (6374/6374), done. fatal: pack has bad object at offset 487227: inflate returned -5 fatal: index-pack failed sascha.si...@flatty:~$ Hi Sascha, the bug seems to be in zlib, not git. git uses the inflate() function from zlib, which, in your case, returns the errors -3 (Z_DATA_ERROR) and -5 (Z_BUF_ERROR). See /usr/include/zlib.h. Thanks, Jonathan Please CC me on replies, as I’m not subscribed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#547503: git-core: git clone fails on armel
Hi folks git clone fails on my Debian armel system: Just to say, there's a 500MHz 512MB armel-sid box here n2100.martinwguy.co.uk that you can use for compilation and over ssh if that's useful - just suggest a username by private email. Good luck! M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#547503: git-core: git clone fails on armel
Hi arm porters, Can you reproduce this problem? If so, any ideas on how to fix it? Gerrit Pape wrote: On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 02:08:20PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: git clone fails on my Debian armel system: sascha.si...@flatty:~$ git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git sugar-jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sascha.silbe/sugar-jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 4772, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2079/2079), done. error: inflate: data stream error (invalid distance too far back) fatal: pack has bad object at offset 616818: inflate returned -3 fatal: index-pack failed sascha.si...@flatty:~$ git clone git://git.gnome.org/jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sascha.silbe/jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 19804, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (6374/6374), done. fatal: pack has bad object at offset 487227: inflate returned -5 fatal: index-pack failed sascha.si...@flatty:~$ Hi Sascha, the bug seems to be in zlib, not git. git uses the inflate() function from zlib, which, in your case, returns the errors -3 (Z_DATA_ERROR) and -5 (Z_BUF_ERROR). See /usr/include/zlib.h. Thanks, Jonathan Please CC me on replies, as I’m not subscribed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#547503: git-core: git clone fails on armel
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 02:08:20PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: git clone fails on my Debian armel system: sascha.si...@flatty:~$ git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git sugar-jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sascha.silbe/sugar-jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 4772, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2079/2079), done. error: inflate: data stream error (invalid distance too far back) fatal: pack has bad object at offset 616818: inflate returned -3 fatal: index-pack failed sascha.si...@flatty:~$ git clone git://git.gnome.org/jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sascha.silbe/jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 19804, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (6374/6374), done. fatal: pack has bad object at offset 487227: inflate returned -5 fatal: index-pack failed sascha.si...@flatty:~$ Hi Sascha, the bug seems to be in zlib, not git. git uses the inflate() function from zlib, which, in your case, returns the errors -3 (Z_DATA_ERROR) and -5 (Z_BUF_ERROR). See /usr/include/zlib.h. Regards, Gerrit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#547503: git-core: git clone fails on armel
Package: git-core Version: 1:1.6.3.3-2 Severity: important git clone fails on my Debian armel system: sascha.si...@flatty:~$ git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git sugar-jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sascha.silbe/sugar-jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 4772, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2079/2079), done. error: inflate: data stream error (invalid distance too far back) fatal: pack has bad object at offset 616818: inflate returned -3 fatal: index-pack failed sascha.si...@flatty:~$ git clone git://git.gnome.org/jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sascha.silbe/jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 19804, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (6374/6374), done. fatal: pack has bad object at offset 487227: inflate returned -5 fatal: index-pack failed sascha.si...@flatty:~$ The same repositories can be checked out fine on a Debian i386 system (inside the same network): sascha.si...@caravan:/tmp/sascha_silbe/tmpbox.PjGIP1AEY7$ git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git sugar-jhbuild Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/sascha_silbe/tmpbox.PjGIP1AEY7/sugar-jhbuild/.git/ remote: Counting objects: 4772, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2079/2079), done. remote: Total 4772 (delta 2815), reused 4486 (delta 2638) Receiving objects: 100% (4772/4772), 1.88 MiB | 607 KiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (2815/2815), done. sascha.si...@caravan:/tmp/sascha_silbe/tmpbox.PjGIP1AEY7$ strace doesn't show anything unusual; ltrace seems stuck inside an infinite loop of unexpected instruction 0xe5bcf76c at 0xac08 (addresses not changing) if given -f to trace children (and without -f doesn't show anything useful). -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: armel (armv5tel) Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-rc9-flatty-ocf-1-00293-g53a104c (PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages git-core depends on: ii libc6 2.9-25 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.19.5-1.1 Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libdigest-sha1-perl 2.12-1 NIST SHA-1 message digest algorith ii liberror-perl 0.17-1 Perl module for error/exception ha ii libexpat1 2.0.1-4 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libgcc1 1:4.4.1-1GCC support library ii perl-modules5.10.0-25Core Perl modules ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-15+b2 compression library - runtime Versions of packages git-core recommends: ii less436-1+b1 pager program similar to more ii openssh-client [ssh-client] 1:5.1p1-7+b1 secure shell client, an rlogin/rsh ii patch 2.5.9-5 Apply a diff file to an original ii rsync 3.0.6-1 fast remote file copy program (lik Versions of packages git-core suggests: pn git-arch none (no description available) pn git-cvs none (no description available) pn git-daemon-runnone (no description available) pn git-doc none (no description available) pn git-email none (no description available) pn git-gui none (no description available) pn git-svn none (no description available) pn gitk none (no description available) pn gitwebnone (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
