Bug#638294: Blocked upgrade of libdap11

2011-09-01 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:56:48AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:39:40AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
   So what? Some reverse build-deps like gdal are still waiting in the dark
   for a rebuild ...
   
  Last I checked the API change in new libdap makes gdal 1.7 unbuildable
  anyway, so that will need a source upload.
  
 
 Thanks, let me check about that. Alastair, should I consider the current 
 libdap 
 version in unstable or the experimental one to prepare a fix?
 

Folks, gdal is now fixed for libdap 3.10+, would you please upload a
definitive version for libdap ASAP in sid ? 

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#638294: Blocked upgrade of libdap11

2011-09-01 Thread Alastair McKinstry

On 2011-09-01 12:35, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:56:48AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:39:40AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

So what? Some reverse build-deps like gdal are still waiting in the dark
for a rebuild ...


Last I checked the API change in new libdap makes gdal 1.7 unbuildable
anyway, so that will need a source upload.


Thanks, let me check about that. Alastair, should I consider the current libdap
version in unstable or the experimental one to prepare a fix?


Folks, gdal is now fixed for libdap 3.10+, would you please upload a
definitive version for libdap ASAP in sid ?


Ok, I've just uploaded libdap-3.11.1-5 to unstable.

regards
Alastair

--
Alastair McKinstry  ,alast...@sceal.ie  ,mckins...@debian.org 
http://blog.sceal.ie

Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world
is either a madman or an economist - Kenneth Boulter, Economist.





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#638294: Blocked upgrade of libdap11

2011-08-30 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 08:08:06PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:43:10 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
 
  Hi,
  
  I have an experimental libdap11 package to fix this in Experimental.
  Can the release team please review this ?
  
 Package: libdap11
 Conflicts: libdap10
 Breaks: libdap10
 Replaces: libdap10
 
 Why?  None of this seems necessary unless I'm missing something.
 
 Package: libdapclient3
 Conflicts: libdap10
 
 I think this should have Replaces (and possibly Breaks instead of
 Conflicts).  Same with libdapserver7.
 
 Cheers,
 Julien
 
 

So what? Some reverse build-deps like gdal are still waiting in the dark
for a rebuild ...

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#638294: Blocked upgrade of libdap11

2011-08-30 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:37:31 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:

 On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 08:08:06PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
  On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:43:10 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
  
   Hi,
   
   I have an experimental libdap11 package to fix this in Experimental.
   Can the release team please review this ?
   
  Package: libdap11
  Conflicts: libdap10
  Breaks: libdap10
  Replaces: libdap10
  
  Why?  None of this seems necessary unless I'm missing something.
  
  Package: libdapclient3
  Conflicts: libdap10
  
  I think this should have Replaces (and possibly Breaks instead of
  Conflicts).  Same with libdapserver7.
  
  Cheers,
  Julien
  
  
 
 So what? Some reverse build-deps like gdal are still waiting in the dark
 for a rebuild ...
 
Last I checked the API change in new libdap makes gdal 1.7 unbuildable
anyway, so that will need a source upload.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#638294: Blocked upgrade of libdap11

2011-08-30 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:39:40AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
  So what? Some reverse build-deps like gdal are still waiting in the dark
  for a rebuild ...
  
 Last I checked the API change in new libdap makes gdal 1.7 unbuildable
 anyway, so that will need a source upload.
 

Thanks, let me check about that. Alastair, should I consider the current libdap 
version in unstable or the experimental one to prepare a fix?

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#638294: Blocked upgrade of libdap11

2011-08-30 Thread Alastair McKinstry

Use the version in unstable to build against.
A header file and not just a symbol were removed; i'm not sure whats 
involved

in making gdal build against it.
To my understanding, no other package directly uses libdap, but rather 
links it
via gdal, but they will need to be rebuilt once gdal is fixed. It would 
be good if

--as-needed was used to remove this false dependency.

regards
Alastair

On 2011-08-30 10:56, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:39:40AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

So what? Some reverse build-deps like gdal are still waiting in the dark
for a rebuild ...


Last I checked the API change in new libdap makes gdal 1.7 unbuildable
anyway, so that will need a source upload.


Thanks, let me check about that. Alastair, should I consider the current libdap
version in unstable or the experimental one to prepare a fix?




--
Alastair McKinstry  ,alast...@sceal.ie  ,mckins...@debian.org 
http://blog.sceal.ie

Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world
is either a madman or an economist - Kenneth Boulter, Economist.





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#638294: Blocked upgrade of libdap11

2011-08-26 Thread Alastair McKinstry

Hi,

I have an experimental libdap11 package to fix this in Experimental.
Can the release team please review this ?

regards
Alastair


On 2011-08-25 18:32, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:

libdap11 also has suspicious Breaks/Conflicts/Replaces: libdap10 and there
must be a proper transition from libdap10 to libdap11 and apparently from
monolithic libdap* to per-soname packages, with proper coordination.




--
Alastair McKinstry  ,alast...@sceal.ie  ,mckins...@debian.org 
http://blog.sceal.ie

Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world
is either a madman or an economist - Kenneth Boulter, Economist.





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#638294: Blocked upgrade of libdap11

2011-08-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:43:10 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I have an experimental libdap11 package to fix this in Experimental.
 Can the release team please review this ?
 
Package: libdap11
Conflicts: libdap10
Breaks: libdap10
Replaces: libdap10

Why?  None of this seems necessary unless I'm missing something.

Package: libdapclient3
Conflicts: libdap10

I think this should have Replaces (and possibly Breaks instead of
Conflicts).  Same with libdapserver7.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org