Re: Adding tiledb to gdal and pdal ? (And help with tiledb-py ?)
Bas, Adding TileDB support for gdal (3.5.0~rc1+dfsg-1) causes the test target to fail. can you be more explicit about the failure ? I've just built GDAL master against tiledb 2.8.2 (using https://github.com/TileDB-Inc/TileDB/releases/download/2.8.2/tiledb-linux-x86_64-2.8.2-6f382df.tar.gz) on my ubuntu 20.04 box and the autotest for it pass. Even -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not.
Re: Adding tiledb to gdal and pdal ? (And help with tiledb-py ?)
On 1/20/22 20:14, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 1/20/22 15:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: The tiledb package is now in testing [1] which means gdal and pdal could configure with it. I tested this over the holiday break with earlier (informal) packages from launchpad -- I still have the repos and could file bug reports with patches if that helped but I think it really is just libtiledb-dev in debian/control for Build-Depends --with-tiledb=yes in debian/rules for configure I have not yet had time to look at tiledb-py. In case someone here in GIS space wants to give me a hand I would all for it :) I am mostly an R/C++ programmer and only package a few things in Python for Debian. While it's good that the tiledb is in a better state now, I think it's a bit early to enable the support now. GDAL 3.5 and PDAL 2.4 might a good time to add tiledb support. Adding TileDB support for gdal (3.5.0~rc1+dfsg-1) causes the test target to fail. GDAL 3.5.0 contains changes to support TileDB 2.7 which suggests this is a regression caused by TileDB 2.8. TileDB support won't be added in 3.5. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Re: Adding tiledb to gdal and pdal ? (And help with tiledb-py ?)
On 21 January 2022 at 07:19, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: | Because I'm skeptical of fads. TileDB is the latest shiny new thing | which hasn't been time tested yet and proven to last. Beg to differ, and think you will come around. Time will tell. | As said before I don't use TileDB, and no users have expressed a need | for it either. So there is no popular demand to get this support added | as soon as possible. It's circular. My colleague do all demos etc in Conda because it's builds there. | > | GDAL 3.5 and PDAL 2.4 might a good time to add tiledb support. | > | > What timeline do you expect here? | | https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/milestone/27 | https://github.com/PDAL/PDAL/milestone/21 Thanks for those links. That looks fine. Best, Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
Re: Adding tiledb to gdal and pdal ? (And help with tiledb-py ?)
On 1/20/22 21:11, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 20 January 2022 at 20:14, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: | On 1/20/22 15:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > The tiledb package is now in testing [1] which means gdal and pdal could | > configure with it. I tested this over the holiday break with earlier | > (informal) packages from launchpad -- I still have the repos and could file | > bug reports with patches if that helped but I think it really is just | > | > libtiledb-dev in debian/control for Build-Depends | > --with-tiledb=yes in debian/rules for configure | > | > I have not yet had time to look at tiledb-py. In case someone here in GIS | > space wants to give me a hand I would all for it :) I am mostly an R/C++ | > programmer and only package a few things in Python for Debian. | | While it's good that the tiledb is in a better state now, I think it's a | bit early to enable the support now. Why? I happen to work at TileDB, have a fairly good handle on the code quality and stability. We have also built Docker containers with the combination for a long time, the support upstream (at the gdal and pdal projects) is good. Because I'm skeptical of fads. TileDB is the latest shiny new thing which hasn't been time tested yet and proven to last. As said before I don't use TileDB, and no users have expressed a need for it either. So there is no popular demand to get this support added as soon as possible. | GDAL 3.5 and PDAL 2.4 might a good time to add tiledb support. What timeline do you expect here? https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/milestone/27 https://github.com/PDAL/PDAL/milestone/21 Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Re: Adding tiledb to gdal and pdal ? (And help with tiledb-py ?)
On 20 January 2022 at 20:14, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: | On 1/20/22 15:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > The tiledb package is now in testing [1] which means gdal and pdal could | > configure with it. I tested this over the holiday break with earlier | > (informal) packages from launchpad -- I still have the repos and could file | > bug reports with patches if that helped but I think it really is just | > | > libtiledb-dev in debian/control for Build-Depends | > --with-tiledb=yes in debian/rules for configure | > | > I have not yet had time to look at tiledb-py. In case someone here in GIS | > space wants to give me a hand I would all for it :) I am mostly an R/C++ | > programmer and only package a few things in Python for Debian. | | While it's good that the tiledb is in a better state now, I think it's a | bit early to enable the support now. Why? I happen to work at TileDB, have a fairly good handle on the code quality and stability. We have also built Docker containers with the combination for a long time, the support upstream (at the gdal and pdal projects) is good. | GDAL 3.5 and PDAL 2.4 might a good time to add tiledb support. What timeline do you expect here? Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
Re: Adding tiledb to gdal and pdal ? (And help with tiledb-py ?)
On 1/20/22 15:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: The tiledb package is now in testing [1] which means gdal and pdal could configure with it. I tested this over the holiday break with earlier (informal) packages from launchpad -- I still have the repos and could file bug reports with patches if that helped but I think it really is just libtiledb-dev in debian/control for Build-Depends --with-tiledb=yes in debian/rules for configure I have not yet had time to look at tiledb-py. In case someone here in GIS space wants to give me a hand I would all for it :) I am mostly an R/C++ programmer and only package a few things in Python for Debian. While it's good that the tiledb is in a better state now, I think it's a bit early to enable the support now. GDAL 3.5 and PDAL 2.4 might a good time to add tiledb support. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Adding tiledb to gdal and pdal ? (And help with tiledb-py ?)
The tiledb package is now in testing [1] which means gdal and pdal could configure with it. I tested this over the holiday break with earlier (informal) packages from launchpad -- I still have the repos and could file bug reports with patches if that helped but I think it really is just libtiledb-dev in debian/control for Build-Depends --with-tiledb=yes in debian/rules for configure I have not yet had time to look at tiledb-py. In case someone here in GIS space wants to give me a hand I would all for it :) I am mostly an R/C++ programmer and only package a few things in Python for Debian. Thanks, Dirk [1] https://packages.debian.org/tiledb -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
