Bug#852305: depends on non existing package libblosc1

2017-01-26 Thread Daniel Stender
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible

Tell me if I miss something ... otherwise I'm going to close this issue in the 
next days.

Anyway, Bcolz is in unstable now.

DS

-- 
4096R/DF5182C8
Debian Developer (sten...@debian.org)
LPIC-1 (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4)
http://www.danielstender.com/

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers


Bug#852305: depends on non existing package libblosc1

2017-01-23 Thread Daniel Stender
On 23.01.2017 14:02, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Package: python-bcolz
> Version: 1.1.0+ds1-2
> Severity: serious
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> on searching what to install to make
> 
> […]/pkg-fio> tools/hist/fiologparser_hist.py
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "tools/hist/fiologparser_hist.py", line 18, in 
> import pandas
> ImportError: No module named pandas
> 
> work, I came across python-bcolz.
> 
> Yet this is not installable:
> 
> […]~> LANG=C sudo apt install python-bcolz
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  python-bcolz : Depends: libblosc1 (>= 1.9.0) but it is not installable
> Recommends: python-numexpr but it is not installable
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> 
> 
> […]~> LANG=C apt-cache policy libblosc1
> libblosc1:
>   Installed: (none)
>   Candidate: (none)
>   Version table:
> 
> […]~> LANG=C apt-cache policy python-numexpr
> python-numexpr:
>   Installed: (none)
>   Candidate: (none)
>   Version table:
> 
> I see no bcolz related upload in 2017, so this issue may be there for quite
> some time already.
> 
> Thanks,
> Martin

Hi Martin,

yep, bcolz won't make it into Debian 9 (too late to fix #329 [1]), but 
libblosc1 should be available [2] ...

Daniel

[1] https://github.com/Blosc/bcolz/issues/329

[2] https://packages.qa.debian.org/c/c-blosc.html


-- 
4096R/DF5182C8
Debian Developer (sten...@debian.org)
LPIC-1 (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4)
http://www.danielstender.com/

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#852305: depends on non existing package libblosc1

2017-01-23 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Package: python-bcolz
Version: 1.1.0+ds1-2
Severity: serious

Dear Maintainer,

on searching what to install to make

[…]/pkg-fio> tools/hist/fiologparser_hist.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "tools/hist/fiologparser_hist.py", line 18, in 
import pandas
ImportError: No module named pandas

work, I came across python-bcolz.

Yet this is not installable:

[…]~> LANG=C sudo apt install python-bcolz
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 python-bcolz : Depends: libblosc1 (>= 1.9.0) but it is not installable
Recommends: python-numexpr but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


[…]~> LANG=C apt-cache policy libblosc1
libblosc1:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: (none)
  Version table:

[…]~> LANG=C apt-cache policy python-numexpr
python-numexpr:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: (none)
  Version table:


I see no bcolz related upload in 2017, so this issue may be there for quite
some time already.

Thanks,
Martin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers experimental
  APT policy: (200, 'experimental')

This is crap. This is unstable with *some* packages from experimental. It does
certainly not prefer experimental.

Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.10.0-rc5-tp520+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers