Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-31 Thread Felix Cheung 
On "support"- Think you said it -

In reference to the links: Docker is not a replacement for Apache releases,
and should not be considered as such.

Should be clear nightly builds should not be on DockerHub, etc


From: Josh Innis 
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 8:08:30 AM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

The community should have a discussion about the need for a docker image of
AGE Viewer before we vote on it.

A docker image of AGE Viewer will ease the adoption of AGE for graph
related problems. It makes it so that a user of AGE Viewer does not have to
have intimate knowledge of: Postgres, AGE, NodeJs and React before they can
get all the components to work together. I think having a docker image of
AGE-Viewer is a great idea.

In reference to the links: Docker is not a replacement for Apache releases,
and should not be considered as such.

What support model do you think is going to be needed for this? Giving
people a method of visualizing their data in the most convenient way
possible seems to be a good idea, but what do you think are the drawbacks
of this decision?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:32 AM Felix Cheung 
wrote:

> I’d suggest the community to have a discussion of the need. What support
> model that will be etc.
>
> Mentor “vote” is more a proxy of having a clear understanding in the
> community.
>
>
> 
> From: Joe Fagan 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 10:14:42 PM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
>
> Hi all, please vote to utilise dockerhub as a distribution method for
> Viewer as it is for AGE
>
> @Felix
>
> The direction from Infra team on the incubator AGE dockerhub request was...
> "Neither of these threads expressly confirm the project's desire to adopt
> DockerHub distribution, they are just discussions about issues related to
> it. Please have your project mentors evaluate and approve the requested
> distribution method."
>
> Can I ask you to either vote, or evaluate and approve the
> dockerhub distribution method for Viewer too, whichever is most
> appropriate, or give further specific advice.
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 05:59, Felix Cheung 
> wrote:
>
> > I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a
> > community you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to
> > vote too
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxzo04gxxkqvmtw7rmzkw8t2d8cf3nwo
> > 
> > From: Felix Cheung 
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:51:05 PM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
> >
> > Shouldn’t this be a vote?
> >
> > Please see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356
> > 
> > From: Joe Fagan 
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
> >
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > We would like to have an image for Incubator AGE Viewer at
> hub.docker.com.
> > Is it possible to approve the creation of
> > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/age-viewer
> > 
> >
> > We will not require push access to this and can instead use automated
> build
> > based on tags in the https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer
> > repository.
> >
> > Once we have your approval we will raise a ticket on JIRA to the Infra
> Team
> > with the relevant details.
> >
> > Thank you
> > Joe
> >
>

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache AGE (incubating) 0.7.0 Release

2022-01-31 Thread Dehowe Feng 
Hi all, Thank you for your review and vote for Apache AGE version 0.7.0.
I'm happy to announce the vote has passed: Many thanks to our mentors for
helping us with the release and IPMC voters that reviewed and submitted
their feedback. We will now move to the next round of voting. 3 +1 Binding
Votes Kevin Ratnasekera vongosling Juan Pan 5 +1 Non Binding Votes Nick
Sorrell Alex Kwak John Gemignani Pieterjan De Potter Young Seung Andrew Ko
Thank You, Dehowe

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE 0.7.0 Release

2022-01-31 Thread Dehowe Feng 
Thanks for everyone's feedback and votes. I will now close this vote and
results will be sent shortly.

Best,

Dehowe

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:41 PM Kevin Ratnasekera 
wrote:

> Kevin Ratnasekera 
> Fri, Sep 24, 2021, 5:04 PM
> to dev
>
> +1
>
> I checked the following.
>
> - Incubating in name.
>
> - PGP Signatures.
>
> - SHA512 Checksums.
>
> - DISCLAIMER exists.
>
> - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine.
>
> - ASF headers on source files.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Kevin
>
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:48 AM vongosling  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I  checked:
> > - LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER are ok
> > - No binary in the source distribution
> > - incubating is in the name
> >
> > Dehowe Feng  于2022年1月19日周三 07:38写道：
> >
> > > Dear Apache Community,
> > >
> > > This is an official vote for the Apache AGE release 0.7.0. that we have
> > > been
> > > working toward it.
> > >
> > > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
> > >
> > > Functionalities included and addressed in this release:
> > >
> > > *Add VLE core to the MATCH clause.
> > > *Added support for various list functions
> > > *range()
> > > *relationships()
> > > *keys()
> > > *label()
> > > *nodes()
> > > *reverse()
> > > *Various bug fixes
> > >
> > > *
> > >
> > > The git tag to be discussed and voted upon:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v.0.7.0-rc0
> > >
> > > The git commit hash: commit d0175f4a2fb03f28c356ea43da3bd48a47f5ef42
> > >
> > > The release files for 0.7.0, can be found at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.7.0.rc0/
> > >
> > > Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file:
> > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/age/KEYS
> > >
> > > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> > > 847F A9F0 CB17 2A51 DEC9 D0F3 8285 D595 875F 13B1
> > >
> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v.0.7.0-rc0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please vote:
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.7.0
> > > [ ] 0 I won't get in the way
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your time.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Dehowe Feng
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards :-)
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE Viewer (incubating) 1.0.0-rc1

2022-01-31 Thread John Gemignani 
I will give this a +1.

However, I haven't seen any traction on this thread for a while. Should this be 
closed and then reopened? Or, should we continue to try to get enough votes? Or?

Mentors, could you please give your input?

Thanks!

John

On 2022/01/10 04:38:32 Alex Kwak wrote:
> Sorry, All.
> 
> It was a mistake to close it. We will continue voting.
> 
> On 2022/01/10 02:37:21 Alex Kwak wrote:
> > Hello Community,
> > 
> > We are closing the vote. Results will be sent shortly.
> > 
> > On 2022/01/06 02:20:46 Alex Kwak wrote:
> > > Dear Apache AGE Community,
> > > 
> > > This is an official vote for the Apache AGE Viewer release v1.0.0-rc1 
> > > that we have been working toward it.
> > > 
> > > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
> > > 
> > > Functionalities included and addressed in this release:
> > > - Graph visualization for AGE.
> > > - Extends edge and vertex point by point.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The vote is open now and until January 8th at 6:00 PM PST and passes if a 
> > > majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> > > 
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE Viewer v1.0.0
> > > [ ] 0 I won't get in the way
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The git tag to be discussed and voted upon
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/releases/tag/v1.0.0-rc1
> > > 
> > > The git commit hash:
> > > commit 2b7fe6018d9da5ce10cf206cc6e879577a3d8051
> > > 
> > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/viewer/apache-age-viewer-1.0.0-incubating-rc1/
> > > 
> > > The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is:
> > > dce65e48c222d4bd0b1be8f571495b50217fcf60d82599702f3e42b36cc5afb0045b798099f981c0db13ed76a94157f9f6dadeb5940a20756bb5c2f6fb6b8009
> > > 
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/age/KEYS
> > > 
> > > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> > > 0E7F 408D 8C6A 1952 329C B379 D471 FDCE 5F5C 5B82
> > > 
> > > For more information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/releases/tag/v1.0.0-rc1
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Alex Kwak
> > > 
> > 
>

Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

2022-01-31 Thread Josh Innis 
The community should have a discussion about the need for a docker image of
AGE Viewer before we vote on it.

A docker image of AGE Viewer will ease the adoption of AGE for graph
related problems. It makes it so that a user of AGE Viewer does not have to
have intimate knowledge of: Postgres, AGE, NodeJs and React before they can
get all the components to work together. I think having a docker image of
AGE-Viewer is a great idea.

In reference to the links: Docker is not a replacement for Apache releases,
and should not be considered as such.

What support model do you think is going to be needed for this? Giving
people a method of visualizing their data in the most convenient way
possible seems to be a good idea, but what do you think are the drawbacks
of this decision?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:32 AM Felix Cheung 
wrote:

> I’d suggest the community to have a discussion of the need. What support
> model that will be etc.
>
> Mentor “vote” is more a proxy of having a clear understanding in the
> community.
>
>
> 
> From: Joe Fagan 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 10:14:42 PM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
>
> Hi all, please vote to utilise dockerhub as a distribution method for
> Viewer as it is for AGE
>
> @Felix
>
> The direction from Infra team on the incubator AGE dockerhub request was...
> "Neither of these threads expressly confirm the project's desire to adopt
> DockerHub distribution, they are just discussions about issues related to
> it. Please have your project mentors evaluate and approve the requested
> distribution method."
>
> Can I ask you to either vote, or evaluate and approve the
> dockerhub distribution method for Viewer too, whichever is most
> appropriate, or give further specific advice.
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 05:59, Felix Cheung 
> wrote:
>
> > I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a
> > community you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to
> > vote too
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxzo04gxxkqvmtw7rmzkw8t2d8cf3nwo
> > 
> > From: Felix Cheung 
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:51:05 PM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
> >
> > Shouldn’t this be a vote?
> >
> > Please see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356
> > 
> > From: Joe Fagan 
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
> >
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > We would like to have an image for Incubator AGE Viewer at
> hub.docker.com.
> > Is it possible to approve the creation of
> > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/age-viewer
> > 
> >
> > We will not require push access to this and can instead use automated
> build
> > based on tags in the https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer
> > repository.
> >
> > Once we have your approval we will raise a ticket on JIRA to the Infra
> Team
> > with the relevant details.
> >
> > Thank you
> > Joe
> >
>