Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-02-22 Thread William A Rowe Jr 
I tally 9 +1 to change to default reply-all semantics,
and one +/-0 ENOCARE vote.  No votes against.

Jeff, would you care to execute the decision with a jira
ticket for apmail, or would you like me to execute?

Cheers,

Bill

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr 
wrote:

> I know we are facing an org-wide change of MLA's, but
> in the meantime...
>
> It's been debated a number of times in the past (far, long
> distant past) but @apr lists operate disjointly with other
> projects, httpd for certain, unknown how subversion is
> currently configured.
>
> At least three significant replies in the past few weeks
> landed in the personal email space that were meant for
> the list.  If we respond to a list-post, I expect to reply
> to the list, although I understand the caution that one
> might intend to reply directly to the poster.  That breaks
> the spirit of collaborative discussion and should be the
> alternate, not the default choice.
>
> So I'll ask this once more for the first time in 10 years...
>
> [ ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics
> [ ] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics
>
> Operational choice, not an implementation debate,
> therefore not subject to vetoes... please chime in...
>
>

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-30 Thread Rainer Jung 

Am 28.01.2016 um 05:08 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:


[ ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics
[X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics


Thanks,

Rainer

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-28 Thread Jeff Trawick 
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Mario Brandt  wrote:

> [  ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics
> [x] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics
>

same here

[X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-28 Thread Mario Brandt 
[  ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics
[x] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-28 Thread Eric Covener 
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Jeff Trawick  wrote:
> [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics
>
me too

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-28 Thread Noel Butler 
On 28/01/2016 14:10, William A Rowe Jr wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr  
> wrote:
> 
>> [] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics 
>> [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics
> 
> Easy choice, but I lived with the old solution under the 
> now abandoned Thunderbird - it is proving much more 
> problematic under gmail.

[X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics 

(I've always believed this for *all lists*, we all on same list and
sending direct wont get read any faster, in my case, it may not get read
at all since this is list-only address, sieve filters everything else to
Junk) 

-- 

If you have the urge to reply to all rather than reply to list, 
you
best first read  http://members.ausics.net/qwerty/

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-27 Thread William A Rowe Jr 
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr 
wrote:

>
> [] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics
> [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics
>

Easy choice, but I lived with the old solution under the
now abandoned Thunderbird - it is proving much more
problematic under gmail.

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-27 Thread Branko Čibej 
On 28.01.2016 05:10, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> > wrote:
>
>
> [] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics
> [X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics
>
>
> Easy choice, but I lived with the old solution under the
> now abandoned Thunderbird - it is proving much more
> problematic under gmail. 

... which is why I shun the amazingly broken gmail UI like the plague
and keep on using TB regardless. Now if gmail had a reply-to-list
option, that'd make me reconsider.

I don't really care how Reply-To is set; either way works for me.

-- Brane

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-27 Thread Nick Kew 
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 22:08 -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:


> [ ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics
> [x] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics

Principle of least surprise.  It's a Gotcha that's
got me a few times over the years. Thanks for taking
the trouble to raise it.

-- 
Nick Kew

Re: Mailing list semantics

2016-01-27 Thread Gregg Smith 

On 1/27/2016 8:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:

[ ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics
[X] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics


Please!